General/Human Research Ethics: Assessment Questions

Question Title

* 1. Please provide your name, surname and UFS student/staff number.

Section 1: Preparing for your GHREC application

Question Title

* 2. Before applying for ethical clearance, what must be completed?

Data collection

Scientific review

Final report

Consent from participants

Question Title

* 3. Who first reviews the submitted ethics application from students?

Faculty reviewer

Supervisor

GHREC chair

RIMS Office

Question Title

* 4. If the supervisor is not satisfied with the application, what can they do?

Make comments and return it to the applicant

Forward it to the department anyway

Submit it directly to GHREC

Discard the application

Question Title

* 5. Which of the following is an application type on the ethics form?

Experimental study

Desktop/literature study

Randomised review

Simulation testing

Question Title

* 6. What should you consult to ensure that your application is complete?

The application outcome video

The application checklist

NHREC policy

RIMS email confirmation

Section 2: Research design

Question Title

* 7. What is the primary purpose of the research design section in an ethics application?

To list academic qualifications

To convince reviewers of funding needs

To explain in a clear and ethical manner how the study will be conducted

To summarise literature

Question Title

* 8. Why should your sampling method be clearly explained?

To satisfy your supervisor

To inflate your sample size

To justify who will participate and how they are selected

To compare with other universities

Question Title

* 9. Why is it important to clearly describe your population and inclusion/exclusion criteria?

To make the study longer

To ensure that the study targets the right participants

To allow random data selection

To get a waiver

Question Title

* 10. What should participants do before data collection begins?

Contact the dean

Review NVivo reports

Give informed consent

Receive funding

Question Title

* 11. Which statement best reflects ethical data collection?

Use any available data to get more results

Audio recordings can be made without consent

Participants must consent, and their comfort and safety must be prioritised

Interviews must be done quickly to save time

Question Title

* 12. What is one of the most common mistakes students make in the research design section?

Referencing their consent form

Explaining sampling

Describing their plan in theoretical rather than practical and ethical terms

Using simple language

Section 3: Risk type and mitigation

Question Title

* 13. What is a risk mitigation strategy for emotional distress?

Delaying debriefing

Providing counselling resources

Avoiding the inclusion of individuals who seem distressed

Ignoring participant concerns

Question Title

* 14. What risk mitigation strategy is appropriate for a possible breach of confidentiality?

Avoid collecting consent

Store data on public servers

Share all data with faculty

Implement data encryption and anonymisation

Question Title

* 15. When using culturally sensitive topics, what is an appropriate action?

Only interview in groups

Allow participants to skip questions

Enforce all questions

Ask for all personal details

Question Title

* 16. What is one way to manage expectations?

Offer rewards

Clearly explain study limitations

Avoid debriefing

Exclude contact details

Question Title

* 17. What should be avoided during focus group discussions to ensure confidentiality?

Providing refreshments

Sharing personal data without ground rules

Collecting feedback

Asking anonymous questions

Section 4: POPIA considerations

Question Title

* 18. What does POPIA consider ‘personal information’?

Published research

Information that can identify a person or company

Only ID numbers

Only financial data

Question Title

* 19. Which of the following is considered special personal information under POPIA?

Email address

Religion

Gender

Employment status

Question Title

* 20. Special personal information requires:

Less scrutiny

Additional justification and handling

Online consent only

Sharing with institutions

Question Title

* 21. What is one common mistake in demographic data collection?

Not using NVivo

Asking too few questions

Collecting irrelevant demographics

Not recording names

Question Title

* 22. At which stage of research is POPIA involved?

Only in qualitative research

Only at publication

Every stage

Only at recruitment

Question Title

* 23. What is the best practice for handling research data?

Publish raw data

Store data in multiple folders

Include names in all reports

Anonymise and assign unique identifiers early

Question Title

* 24. What happens once data is fully anonymised?

It becomes sensitive

POPIA no longer applies

It is no longer useful

Consent must be renewed

Question Title

* 25. Which of these is NOT POPIA-compliant?

UFS OneDrive

MS Teams

Free Google Drive

EVASYS

Question Title

* 26. What is third-party data?

Data from literature

Survey results

Information from someone other than the participant

Data from SPSS

Section 5: Attachments to ethics applications

Question Title

* 27. Which version of the research proposal must be submitted?

A summary without the methodology

Supervisor’s personal copy

Final version with no track changes or comments

A rough draft

Question Title

* 28. Which tense must the methodology section of the proposal use?

Conditional tense

Future tense

Past tense

Present tense

Question Title

* 29. How should data collection instruments be labelled?

According to the study title

With anonymous codes

Clearly with method and target group

Alphabetically

Question Title

* 30. Why must consent forms be professionally written?

To comply with NHREC policies

Because students are not allowed to write their own

They are public-facing documents and must be clear and respectful

To impress the reviewers

Question Title

* 31. What is a gatekeeper approval letter?

A student note

An official document from the organisation granting access

An unsigned permission slip

A letter from the RIMS office

Question Title

* 32. What should the gatekeeper letter include?

Participant names

Supervisor’s signature

Official letterhead and a clear permission statement

A confidentiality clause

Question Title

* 33. What must be attached as proof that scientific concerns have been addressed?

Ethics training certificate

Signed scientific review form

Draft proposal

Supervisor’s email

Question Title

* 34. What happens if the proposal is written in the past tense?

It must be explained in a letter

Nothing, it is just style

It may be rejected as it implies that data collection has begun

It is passed on to the faculty

Question Title

* 35. Consent forms must include which of the following?

Bibliography of references

Purpose of the study and participant rights

Supervisor’s biography

Data encryption steps

Section 6: Submission deadlines and post-application process

Question Title

* 36. When are GHREC applications reviewed?

Daily

Monthly

Weekly

Quarterly

Question Title

* 37. What happens if a student submits their application on the second of a month?

It goes to NHREC

It is reviewed the following month

It is rejected automatically

It is reviewed the same day

Question Title

* 38. What must happen for the application to leave the applicant’s inbox?

Supervisor approval

Clicking the ‘Submit’ button and receiving confirmation

Scientific review form attached

Consent forms uploaded

Question Title

* 39. What must happen before the first of the month to ensure timely review?

The final report must be filed

The decision letter must be printed

The supervisor must approve on RIMS

Submission to the POPIA office

Question Title

* 40. What is the role of the faculty reviewer?

Review submitted data

Evaluate applications before the GHREC meeting

Design recruitment posters

Approve the software used in the analysis

Question Title

* 41. When does the GHREC not meet?

March

December

January

June

Question Title

* 42. What happens if no confirmation email is received?

The supervisor will call the GHREC Chair

Contact the RIMS Office immediately

Ethics approval is still granted

Nothing changes

Section 7: GHREC outcomes, extensions, and amendments

Question Title

* 43. What does ‘Approval’ mean in a GHREC outcome?

The proposal must be rewritten

Participant recruitment has already started

All ethical requirements have been met, and data collection can start

Modifications are still required

Question Title

* 44. What does ‘Conditional approval’ mean in a GHREC outcome?

The study must be completed within a month

Data collection can start

Participant recruitment can start

Specific items must be uploaded before approval is granted, and data collection can begin

Question Title

* 45. What must be submitted if ‘Conditional approval’ is granted?

Signed consent forms

Missing documentation such as gatekeeper letters

Final report

POPIA certificate

Question Title

* 46. What is required when the application is marked ‘Modifications required’?

Supervisor approval

A completed modification form with clear responses

Data analysis

Publication draft

Question Title

* 47. What happens if the application is rejected?

The waiver is automatically issued

The study may not be conducted

The supervisor may override the decision

Data collection may commence

Question Title

* 48. How long is ethics approval valid?

3 months

As long as it takes to collect the data

12 months

24 months

Question Title

* 49. What should be included in a final report?

POPIA checklist

Only the findings

Summary of research, complaints, and data disposition

Bibliography only

Question Title

* 50. A waiver is only applicable when:

Research uses online data collection

Minor risks exist

There is no primary data collection (e.g., desktop study)

Participants are anonymous

A minimum score of 70% is required to pass. If you achieve less than 70%, kindly retake the quiz to ensure successful completion.