The Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts is currently consulting on remote ID for drones.  (See https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/news/share-your-thoughts-drone-remote-id).

Answers to the following short survey will help AAUS build an advocacy position in relation to remote ID. 

Thank you for taking the time to contribute.  

Your privacy will be protected and names of individuals and organisations will not be disclosed. All responses will be de-identified, pooled and aggregated to ensure anonymity of the respondents.
Results obtained from the survey will be released to the membership at the end of the survey period.
Survey closes July 21, 2023
Estimated time to complete: 3 minutes

Question Title

* 1. Do you support a remote ID mandate?

Question Title

* 2. What do you believe will be the major benefit of a drone remote ID mandate?

Question Title

* 3. What is your main concern relating to a remote ID mandate?

Question Title

* 4. Do you believe that remote ID is necessary for drone operations within standard operating conditions (visual line of site, below 400 ft and clear of people and aerodromes)?

Question Title

* 5. Do you believe that remote ID is necessary for drone operations that are beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS)?

Question Title

* 6. Do you think that a mandate for ADS-B or lower power electronic conspicuity devices for all VFR aircraft and BVLOS drones would lead to better situational awareness in Class G airspace over remote ID on drones?

Question Title

* 7. If the government decided to mandate remote ID, who should have access to the data and what information?

Question Title

* 8. If you had to choose between Broadcast remote ID (BRID) or network based remote ID (NRID), which do you favour?

Question Title

* 9. What impacts could mandatory equipage have on drone operators?

Question Title

* 10. Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

T