Member and stakeholder consultation on the detection and treatment of coronary artery disease remote from an acute coronary syndrome – symptomatic or asymptomatic
We invite World Heart Federation members and partners to share their perspective on how coronary artery disease (CAD) is detected and treated outside the setting of an acute coronary syndrome- in people with stable symptoms as well as those with no symptoms at all- in their country or region. Your input will directly shape a WHF roadmap focused on making detection and treatment equitable and scalable across high-, middle-, and low-income settings.

Why this matters. Coronary artery disease develops silently long before an acute event — yet too often it is recognised only when a heart attack or sudden death occurs. For people who do have symptoms, such as chest pain or shortness of breath, what happens next varies widely between and within countries: which investigation is available, how quickly it is done, and whether the findings translate into effective long-term treatment. Others have no symptoms at all, yet harbour advanced and dangerous disease. Symptoms can be an unreliable guide to the severity of underlying disease: silent CAD is not mild CAD- it is undetected CAD, and it may be of any severity. This matters more than ever, because we now have treatments that can halt the progression of atherosclerosis and dramatically reduce heart attacks and death- yet in practice these have been reserved almost entirely for people who have already suffered and survived a heart attack. Detecting disease earlier is what allows that same proven protection to be offered before the event, rather than only to those who survive it. This consultation is concerned with CAD away from the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, in both groups- not with the emergency management of a heart attack. It asks how we can find and treat that disease earlier, and more fairly, everywhere.

How your input will be used. Your answers will do more than describe the situation in your own setting. Taken together, responses from across the WHF membership will show where detection and treatment currently fall short, and for whom- the variation between and within countries that published data rarely capture. That evidence will shape the roadmap's practical recommendations: what a workable pathway looks like where resources are constrained, how proven care can be scaled without widening inequity, and which measures would show whether quality of care and outcomes are genuinely improving. Where your setting has found approaches that work, we would like them to inform what we recommend to others.

Please feel free to forward this survey to others in your country or region working to reduce the burden of CAD, including clinicians, public health and policy colleagues, NGOs, and patient representatives.

The survey takes approximately 10–15 minutes. Questions marked * are required. If you have any questions, please contact Lana Raspail at lana.raspail@worldheart.org.

Co-chairs: Professor Gemma Figtree and Professor George Mensah (World Heart Federation).
Section A - About you

Question Title

1. In which country do you live?

Question Title

2. In which country do you work? (Required.)

Question Title

3. Which best describes your main work setting?

Question Title

4. Which type of healthcare system do you predominantly work in?

Question Title

5. Setting where you practise or work at least 50% of your time: (Required.)

Question Title

6. Occupation: (Required.)

Section B - Detecting CAD in your setting
These questions describe how CAD is currently found in your setting and which tools are available.

Question Title

7. In your setting, how is CAD most commonly first identified? (Select the most common) (Required.)

For questions 8 – 13, please give reply for your specific setting, considering your location, health system and health facility type, not for your country as a whole.

Question Title

8. For patients with suspected stable angina, which non-invasive investigations are available and routinely used in your setting? (Select all that apply) (Required.)

Question Title

9. Please indicate your level of access to invasive investigation in your setting if a patient, remote to ACS, requires angiography (Required.)

  Readily available Limited Not available Don’t know
Catheterisation laboratory for coronary angiography
Invasive physiology (FFR / iFR) in the cath lab
Intravascular imaging (IVUS/OCT) in the cath lab

Question Title

10. For asymptomatic individuals, which risk-assessment approaches are available? (Select all that apply) (Required.)

Question Title

11. When coronary calcium is seen incidentally on a non-cardiac chest CT in your setting, is it routinely reported and acted on?

Question Title

12. For each of the following, how would you describe its availability and use in your setting?

  Readily available and used Available but underused Difficult to obtain Not available Don’t know
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)
Coronary artery calcium score (CACS)
Functional / stress testing
Invasive coronary angiography (incl. FFR / iFR)
Statins / lipid-lowering therapy

Question Title

13. For each of the following, what are the main obstacles in your setting? (Tick all that apply)

  Not available / no equipment Cost or not funded Workforce / expertise gap Waiting times / referral hurdles Don’t know
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)
Coronary artery calcium score (CACS)
Functional / stress testing
Invasive coronary angiography (incl. FFR / iFR)
Statins / lipid-lowering therapy

Question Title

14. Please indicate your agreement with the following statement about your setting. (Required.)

  Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
It is well recognised in my setting that CAD can be severe and dangerous while causing no symptoms.
Investigation for CAD is usually triggered only once a patient develops symptoms.
Section C - Barriers

Question Title

15. Please indicate how far you agree that each of the following is a barrier to the early detection and pre-symptomatic treatment of CAD in your setting. (Rank in order of importance) (Required.)

Section D: Possible solutions

Question Title

16. Please indicate how far you agree that each of the following would help enable equitable, scalable early detection and pre-symptomatic treatment in your setting. (Select 5 solutions) (Required.)

Section E - Your perspective

Question Title

17. Please describe any initiatives, frameworks, or guidelines for early detection of CAD in your region (include links, if any).

Question Title

18. Are there useful references or evidence on early detection and pre-symptomatic treatment of CAD that we should consider?

Question Title

19. Are there any new focus areas or challenges in CAD detection and prevention that we should be aware of?

Question Title

20. Do you have any other comments or suggestions?

Question Title

21. If you would like to be updated on the results of this consultation, please provide your email address (optional). It will be used only to keep you informed.

Thank you for contributing to the WHF Roadmap on Coronary Artery Disease.

T