Question Title

1. Select one of the following to describe yourself:

Question Title

2. Overall, how useful or relevant did you find this conference for advancing your work?

Question Title

3. On a scale of 1 to 5 stars. How would you rate the balance between clinical and basic science of this conference?

Question Title

4. From your point of view did the programme cover a suitable range of topics?

Question Title

5. Would you have preferred longer but fewer talks or short but multiple talks in a session?

Question Title

6. Did you feel there was adequate time for discussion after the presentations?

Question Title

7. Was there adequate time for posters?

Question Title

8. Which of the sessions was of greatest interest to you?

Question Title

9. Was there an area of research that you would have liked to have seen covered that was not featured?

Question Title

10. Please let us know whether you like the concept of the new working groups:

Question Title

11. Please explain your answer

Question Title

12. Did you make new contacts at the conference?

Question Title

13. If yes, how likely do you think it is that the contacts you made at the conference will enhance your work?

Question Title

14. Do you feel that this conference struck the right balance between free time to network and the time devoted to presentations?

Question Title

15. Please add any comments below

Question Title

16. What was the best thing about the conference for you?

Question Title

17. On a Scale of 1 to 5 Stars: Please rate the overall organization of the conference. (Registration, Logistics and Communication)

Question Title

18. What length of conference would be most likely to encourage your attendance?

Question Title

19. Would you prefer the next conference to be online or in person?

Question Title

20. Please use one word to describe your conference experience?

Question Title

21. Do you have any further comments or suggestions?

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey.

T