Introduction

The ALGA Asbestos Interest Group has a working group tasked with reviewing the NZ GAMAS published by BRANZ.  To help us do this, we would appreciate your input on the current document.  Opportunity to comment closes on 29 May 2020.

Question Title

* 1. Who are you?

Question Title

* 2. Are you using the NZ GAMAS published by BRANZ?

Question Title

* 3. If you are not using the NZ GAMAS, what guidelines are you using instead and why?

Question Title

* 4. How useful is the flowchart in Figure 1?

Question Title

* 5. In the flowchart, what works and what doesn’t work?

Question Title

* 6. Would it be helpful to get more clarity on the roles and responsibilities of various parties (SQEP, Assessor etc.) involved in asbestos in soil work?

Question Title

* 7. Would you support amendments to the current Tier 1 guidelines based on sufficient risk-based evidence (e.g. WA guidelines)?

Question Title

* 8. On a scale of 1 to 5,(with 5 most useful), how helpful would expanded guidance on the following issues be:

  1 2 3 4 5
Naturally occuring asbestos
The overlap between compliance with the Asbestos Regulations and the NESCS
Background concentrations of asbestos in urban environments
Methods of investigation of asbestos contaminated soil
Health and safety during site investigation on asbestos contaminated sites
Laboratory soil analysis methods and reporting
Derivation of guideline values for asbestos
Tier 2 risk assessment
When air monitoring is required
In-situ management of asbestos contaminated soil
Management and disposal of low-concentration asbestos contaminated soil
Managing asbestos contaminated concrete and crushed concrete
Waste disposal of asbestos contaminated soil
Site validation methodology and requirements
Asbestos Management Plans
Health and safety when working with asbestos contaminated soil, including health monitoring
Competency, accreditations and training

Question Title

* 9. Have you noticed anything that may be missing in the current guidelines?

Question Title

* 10. Have you noticed anything that may be incorrect in the current guidelines?

Question Title

* 11. Are there any sections that require revision/rewording in the current guideline to improve clarity?

Question Title

* 12. Is the document consistent with other regulations and guidance dealing with asbestos management?

Question Title

* 13. Do you feel the document has sufficient legal standing, i.e. endorsement from government agencies such as WorkSafe, councils and MfE?

Question Title

* 14. Does the document speak to all audiences that have a role in management of asbestos in soil?

  Yes No
Demolition contractors
Contaminated land consultants
Council staff including planners/consent processing staff
Laboratory analysts
Ministry for the Environment
Ministry of Health
WorkSafe
Asbestos assessors

Question Title

* 15. Would it be helpful if the document included standard templates/ examples for:

  Yes No
Laboratory analysis reports
Field screening record sheets

Question Title

* 16. Would you like us to contact you regarding your response?

Question Title

* 17. If yes, please provide your contact details

T