Participant Evaluation Form

New England Life Care 
Population Health and Value Management Symposium
September 16th, 2022
QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION:
1.Gregg Meyer, MD, MSc
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
2.Jared Conley, MD, PhD, MPH
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
3.Margaret Georgia, BSN, MBA, RN, CCM
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
4.Melissa Borrows, BSN, RN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
5.Mary Beth Erwin, MPH, RPh
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
6.Dan Henderson, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
7.Colleen Kershaw, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
8.Sarah Mullins
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
9.Christopher Wellins, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
10.Courtney Pladsen DNP, FNP, RN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
11.Alain Loriaux, PharmD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
12.Peng Cheng Li, PharmD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Organization and clarity of content
Effectiveness of teaching methods
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
13.As a result of this activity, I am able to identify 1-2 strategies or resources per presentation they have learned that will contribute to improved quality of patient care, improved processes contributing to optimal patient flow and patient experience.
14.Were the presentations free from commercial bias?
15.As a result of this activity, please share at least one action you will take to change your professional practice/ performance: 
16.ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS:
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Promotional information provided adequate information
Registration process was efficient
Scheduling of the activity met my needs
17.General comments about the program:
18.Suggestions for future program topics:
Thank you for coming to our Population Health and Value Management Symposium!
19.If obtaining CNEs, please leave the email address you would like your certificate sent to
20.Please enter your name and credentials