Participant Evaluation Form
New England Life Care
Population Health and Value Management Symposium
September 16th, 2022
QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION:
1.
Gregg Meyer, MD, MSc
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
2.
Jared Conley, MD, PhD, MPH
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
3.
Margaret Georgia, BSN, MBA, RN, CCM
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
4.
Melissa Borrows, BSN, RN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
5.
Mary Beth Erwin, MPH, RPh
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
6.
Dan Henderson, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
7.
Colleen Kershaw, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
8.
Sarah Mullins
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
9.
Christopher Wellins, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
10.
Courtney Pladsen DNP, FNP, RN
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
11.
Alain Loriaux, PharmD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
12.
Peng Cheng Li, PharmD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Knowledge of subject
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Organization and clarity of content
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Effectiveness of teaching methods
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Other (please specify)
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
13.
As a result of this activity, I am able to identify 1-2 strategies or resources per presentation they have learned that will contribute to improved quality of patient care, improved processes contributing to optimal patient flow and patient experience.
Yes
No, please explain
14.
Were the presentations free from commercial bias?
Yes
No, please explain
15.
As a result of this activity, please share at least one action you will take to change your professional practice/ performance:
16.
ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS:
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Promotional information provided adequate information
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Registration process was efficient
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Scheduling of the activity met my needs
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
17.
General comments about the program:
18.
Suggestions for future program topics:
Thank you for coming to our Population Health and Value Management Symposium!
19.
If obtaining CNEs, please leave the email address you would like your certificate sent to
20.
Please enter your name and credentials