PBRF Sector Reference Group - Consultation Paper 3: Redesign of Evidence Portfolios

Question Title

* 1. Please provide your contact details. Note that no identifying personal data will be made public, but we may contact you to follow up on your responses.

Name *

Company *

Job title

Email Address *

Question Title

* 2. If you are responding on behalf of an organisation, please tell us the name of that organisation

Question Title

* 3. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your career stage (if applicable)

Early career

Mid career

Late career

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your ethnicity (and iwi/hapū if applicable)

Question Title

* 5. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your gender identity

Female

Male

Gender Diverse

Prefer not to say

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. What should an Example of Research Excellence comprise?

Option 1: Single research output (paragraph 42, consultation paper)

Option 2: Core research output plus up to four research activities and/or outputs (paragraph 43 and see also question 7)

Option 3: Combined ERE and OERE comprising core research output plus up to five research activities and/or outputs (paragraph 44 and see also question 7)

Another option (please provide details below)

Question Title

* 7. What comprises an ERE: if you prefer Option 2 or Option 3, do you think that only research activities should be eligible as supplementary items, or that both research activities and research outputs should be eligible?

Only research activities should be eligible as supplementary items (paragraph 43 sub-option 2a)

Both research activities and research outputs should be eligible as supplementary items (paragrah 43 sub-option 2b)

Another option: please provide details below

Question Title

* 8. What is your preferred approach to the minimum number of EREs in an EP?

Option 1: retain minimum of one and maximum of four setting; EPs with Extraordinary Circumstances must contain fewer than four EREs (paragraph 50).

Option 2: all EPs must contain four EREs unless one of the exceptions apply (paragraph 51)

Another option (please provide details)

Question Title

* 9. Other Example of Research Excellence: do you agree that research outputs and research activities should be eligible items?

Yes

Please provide any comments or suggestions

Question Title

* 10. How many OEREs should an EP include?

Option 1: up to 12 (paragraph 55)

Option 2: up to 8 (paragraph 56)

Option 3: ERE and OERE combined; no standalone OEREs submitted (paragraph 57)

Another option (please provide details)

Question Title

* 11. Renaming the Research Contribution component: do you agree with the proposal to rename the component Contributions to Research Environment?

Yes

Please provide any comments or suggestions

Question Title

* 12. Research Contribution activity types: do you agree with the proposal to reduce the eligible types to those which relate to research environment, if the remaining types were eligible as research activities within EREs and/or OEREs?

Yes

Please provide any suggested changes to the research activity type name or detailed descriptions. If you would like to propose another option or make additional comments, please also do so here.

Question Title

* 13. What should the Research Contribution component comprise?

Option 1: up to 15 items, no narrative (paragraph 73)

Option 2: up to 15 items plus narrative (paragraph 74)

Option 3: up to 10 items plus narrative (paragraph 75)

Another option (please provide details)

PBRF Sector Reference Group - Consultation Paper 3: Redesign of Evidence Portfolios

Question Title

* 1. Please provide your contact details. Note that no identifying personal data will be made public, but we may contact you to follow up on your responses.

Question Title

* 2. If you are responding on behalf of an organisation, please tell us the name of that organisation

Question Title

* 3. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your career stage (if applicable)

Question Title

* 4. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your ethnicity (and iwi/hapū if applicable)

Question Title

* 5. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your gender identity

Question Title

* 6. What should an Example of Research Excellence comprise?

Question Title

* 7. What comprises an ERE: if you prefer Option 2 or Option 3, do you think that only research activities should be eligible as supplementary items, or that both research activities and research outputs should be eligible?

Question Title

* 8. What is your preferred approach to the minimum number of EREs in an EP?

Question Title

* 9. Other Example of Research Excellence: do you agree that research outputs and research activities should be eligible items?

Question Title

* 10. How many OEREs should an EP include?

Question Title

* 11. Renaming the Research Contribution component: do you agree with the proposal to rename the component Contributions to Research Environment?

Question Title

* 12. Research Contribution activity types: do you agree with the proposal to reduce the eligible types to those which relate to research environment, if the remaining types were eligible as research activities within EREs and/or OEREs?

Question Title

* 13. What should the Research Contribution component comprise?

Question Title

* 14. We welcome any other feedback you wish to make on the issues covered in Consultation Paper #3