Session Evaluation - Liane Belland, Elizabeth Randle, Olga Bougie, Kristina Arendas, Shiraz Moola

Breakout session:
Career Planning

Speakers: Drs. Liane Belland, Elizabeth Randle, Olga Bougie, Kristina Arendas, Shiraz Moola

Learning objectives:
At the conclusion of this activity, the participant will be able to:

Describe my personal career path
Discuss different career options including community and academic practice
Consider important factors in career selection, including personal interests, career goals, family planning, and financial remuneration

Conflict of interest disclosure are available in the conference mobile application.

	1 - Strongly disagree	2 - Disagree	3 - Neutral	4 - Agree	5 - Strongly agree
Met the stated learning objectives	Met the stated learning objectives 1 - Strongly disagree	Met the stated learning objectives 2 - Disagree	Met the stated learning objectives 3 - Neutral	Met the stated learning objectives 4 - Agree	Met the stated learning objectives 5 - Strongly agree
Enhanced my knowledge	Enhanced my knowledge 1 - Strongly disagree	Enhanced my knowledge 2 - Disagree	Enhanced my knowledge 3 - Neutral	Enhanced my knowledge 4 - Agree	Enhanced my knowledge 5 - Strongly agree
Satisfied my expectations	Satisfied my expectations 1 - Strongly disagree	Satisfied my expectations 2 - Disagree	Satisfied my expectations 3 - Neutral	Satisfied my expectations 4 - Agree	Satisfied my expectations 5 - Strongly agree
Conveyed information that applied to my pratice	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 1 - Strongly disagree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 2 - Disagree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 3 - Neutral	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 4 - Agree	Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 5 - Strongly agree
Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 1 - Strongly disagree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 2 - Disagree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 3 - Neutral	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 4 - Agree	Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 5 - Strongly agree
Was free from commercial bias	Was free from commercial bias 1 - Strongly disagree	Was free from commercial bias 2 - Disagree	Was free from commercial bias 3 - Neutral	Was free from commercial bias 4 - Agree	Was free from commercial bias 5 - Strongly agree

1 - Strongly disagree

2 - Disagree

3 - Neutral

4 - Agree

5 - Strongly agree

Met the stated learning objectives

Met the stated learning objectives 1 - Strongly disagree

Met the stated learning objectives 2 - Disagree

Met the stated learning objectives 3 - Neutral

Met the stated learning objectives 4 - Agree

Met the stated learning objectives 5 - Strongly agree

Enhanced my knowledge

Enhanced my knowledge 1 - Strongly disagree

Enhanced my knowledge 2 - Disagree

Enhanced my knowledge 3 - Neutral

Enhanced my knowledge 4 - Agree

Enhanced my knowledge 5 - Strongly agree

Satisfied my expectations

Satisfied my expectations 1 - Strongly disagree

Satisfied my expectations 2 - Disagree

Satisfied my expectations 3 - Neutral

Satisfied my expectations 4 - Agree

Satisfied my expectations 5 - Strongly agree

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 1 - Strongly disagree

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 2 - Disagree

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 3 - Neutral

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 4 - Agree

Conveyed information that applied to my pratice 5 - Strongly agree

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 1 - Strongly disagree

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 2 - Disagree

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 3 - Neutral

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 4 - Agree

Allocated at least 25 % of the time for interaction 5 - Strongly agree

Was free from commercial bias

Was free from commercial bias 1 - Strongly disagree

Was free from commercial bias 2 - Disagree

Was free from commercial bias 3 - Neutral

Was free from commercial bias 4 - Agree

Was free from commercial bias 5 - Strongly agree

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Knowledge

Knowledge 1 - Bad

Knowledge 2 - Not bad

Knowledge 3 - Good

Knowledge 4 - Very good

Knowledge 5 - Extremely good

Presentation skills

Presentation skills 1 - Bad

Presentation skills 2 - Not bad

Presentation skills 3 - Good

Presentation skills 4 - Very good

Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good

Topic relevance

Topic relevance 1 - Bad

Topic relevance 2 - Not bad

Topic relevance 3 - Good

Topic relevance 4 - Very good

Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Knowledge

Knowledge 1 - Bad

Knowledge 2 - Not bad

Knowledge 3 - Good

Knowledge 4 - Very good

Knowledge 5 - Extremely good

Presentation skills

Presentation skills 1 - Bad

Presentation skills 2 - Not bad

Presentation skills 3 - Good

Presentation skills 4 - Very good

Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good

Topic relevance

Topic relevance 1 - Bad

Topic relevance 2 - Not bad

Topic relevance 3 - Good

Topic relevance 4 - Very good

Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Knowledge

Knowledge 1 - Bad

Knowledge 2 - Not bad

Knowledge 3 - Good

Knowledge 4 - Very good

Knowledge 5 - Extremely good

Presentation skills

Presentation skills 1 - Bad

Presentation skills 2 - Not bad

Presentation skills 3 - Good

Presentation skills 4 - Very good

Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good

Topic relevance

Topic relevance 1 - Bad

Topic relevance 2 - Not bad

Topic relevance 3 - Good

Topic relevance 4 - Very good

Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Knowledge

Knowledge 1 - Bad

Knowledge 2 - Not bad

Knowledge 3 - Good

Knowledge 4 - Very good

Knowledge 5 - Extremely good

Presentation skills

Presentation skills 1 - Bad

Presentation skills 2 - Not bad

Presentation skills 3 - Good

Presentation skills 4 - Very good

Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good

Topic relevance

Topic relevance 1 - Bad

Topic relevance 2 - Not bad

Topic relevance 3 - Good

Topic relevance 4 - Very good

Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Knowledge	Knowledge 1 - Bad	Knowledge 2 - Not bad	Knowledge 3 - Good	Knowledge 4 - Very good	Knowledge 5 - Extremely good
Presentation skills	Presentation skills 1 - Bad	Presentation skills 2 - Not bad	Presentation skills 3 - Good	Presentation skills 4 - Very good	Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good
Topic relevance	Topic relevance 1 - Bad	Topic relevance 2 - Not bad	Topic relevance 3 - Good	Topic relevance 4 - Very good	Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Knowledge

Knowledge 1 - Bad

Knowledge 2 - Not bad

Knowledge 3 - Good

Knowledge 4 - Very good

Knowledge 5 - Extremely good

Presentation skills

Presentation skills 1 - Bad

Presentation skills 2 - Not bad

Presentation skills 3 - Good

Presentation skills 4 - Very good

Presentation skills 5 - Extremely good

Topic relevance

Topic relevance 1 - Bad

Topic relevance 2 - Not bad

Topic relevance 3 - Good

Topic relevance 4 - Very good

Topic relevance 5 - Extremely good

	1 - Bad	2 - Not bad	3 - Good	4 - Very good	5 - Extremely good
Overall	Overall 1 - Bad	Overall 2 - Not bad	Overall 3 - Good	Overall 4 - Very good	Overall 5 - Extremely good

1 - Bad

2 - Not bad

3 - Good

4 - Very good

5 - Extremely good

Overall

Overall 1 - Bad

Overall 2 - Not bad

Overall 3 - Good

Overall 4 - Very good

Overall 5 - Extremely good

Session Evaluation - Liane Belland, Elizabeth Randle, Olga Bougie, Kristina Arendas, Shiraz Moola | CanSAGE 2023

Question Title

* 1. Your name and email (this information will not be shared with anyone)

Question Title

* 2. Please rate the quality of the session on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

Question Title

* 3. If you perceived any sources of commercial bias, please describe:

Question Title

* 4. What did you learn or how will this educational session impact your practice?

Question Title

* 5. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity?

Question Title

* 6. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Liane Belland:

Question Title

* 7. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Elizabeth Randle:

Question Title

* 8. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Olga Bougie:

Question Title

* 9. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Kristina Arendas:

Question Title

* 10. Please rate the presenter, Dr. Shiraz Moola:

Question Title

* 11. Please rate the overall session:

Question Title

* 12. Any additional comments?