1.The organization has a reliability engineering attitude/mentality.

Yes, it exists as part of the work culture

Yes, it exists and is being developed as part of the work culture

No

2.Complete and accurate asset data is available for Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) analysis on:

90% or more of the assets

75 to 89% of the assets

60 to 74% of the assets

40 to 59% of the assets

Less than 40% of the assets

3.Is the RCM methodology used to adjust/refine the PM/PDM program?

Yes

No

4.RCM analysis is conducted on all assets:

Annually

Every 6 months

Every 2 years

Every 3 years

Any longer than three years

5.The work order history is accurate in tracking the causes of failures:

90% or more of the asset’s history

75 to 89% of the asset’s history

60 to 74% of the asset’s history

40 to 59% of the asset’s history

Less than 40% of the asset’s history

6.Are failures clearly identified?

90% or more of the asset’s history

75 to 89% of the asset’s history

60 to 74% of the asset’s history

40 to 59% of the asset’s history

Less than 40% of the asset’s history

7.Failure analysis is conducted using analysis tool such as why tree, fishbone, and Patero, to assure accuracy and consistency of the effort.

Yes

No

8.Dedicated personnel are permanently assigned to maintain the RCM program.

Yes

No

9.Management views RCM as a value added activity?

Yes

No

10.Are methods in place for measuring the effectiveness of the reliability engineering effort?

Yes

No

11.Feel free to provide any information or comments you care to here. They will be read by several human beings!