General Session: Thursday, September 22, 8:15 am – 10:15 am Exit this survey PART ONE: Improving Research Practice John Ioannidis, MD, DSc Objective: To disseminate information on new developments in applied and translational sciences, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and technology for individuals with cerebral palsy and other childhood onset disabilities. Question Title * 1. Presentation Content Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree The content of this presentation was consistent with its objectives The content of this presentation was consistent with its objectives Strongly Agree The content of this presentation was consistent with its objectives Agree The content of this presentation was consistent with its objectives Neutral The content of this presentation was consistent with its objectives Disagree The content of this presentation was consistent with its objectives Strongly Disagree The presentation provided new knowledge and/or skills The presentation provided new knowledge and/or skills Strongly Agree The presentation provided new knowledge and/or skills Agree The presentation provided new knowledge and/or skills Neutral The presentation provided new knowledge and/or skills Disagree The presentation provided new knowledge and/or skills Strongly Disagree Question Title * 2. Speaker Effectiveness Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree The speaker used the allotted time efficiently The speaker used the allotted time efficiently Strongly Agree The speaker used the allotted time efficiently Agree The speaker used the allotted time efficiently Neutral The speaker used the allotted time efficiently Disagree The speaker used the allotted time efficiently Strongly Disagree The speaker’s style of presentation was conducive to learning The speaker’s style of presentation was conducive to learning Strongly Agree The speaker’s style of presentation was conducive to learning Agree The speaker’s style of presentation was conducive to learning Neutral The speaker’s style of presentation was conducive to learning Disagree The speaker’s style of presentation was conducive to learning Strongly Disagree The speaker demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the subject matter The speaker demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the subject matter Strongly Agree The speaker demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the subject matter Agree The speaker demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the subject matter Neutral The speaker demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the subject matter Disagree The speaker demonstrated a thorough knowledge of the subject matter Strongly Disagree Question Title * 3. Teaching Aids Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree The teaching aids (slides, audio/video tapes, handouts, etc.) were appropriate The teaching aids (slides, audio/video tapes, handouts, etc.) were appropriate Strongly Agree The teaching aids (slides, audio/video tapes, handouts, etc.) were appropriate Agree The teaching aids (slides, audio/video tapes, handouts, etc.) were appropriate Neutral The teaching aids (slides, audio/video tapes, handouts, etc.) were appropriate Disagree The teaching aids (slides, audio/video tapes, handouts, etc.) were appropriate Strongly Disagree Question Title * 4. General Implementation of CE/CME Activity Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree The level of expertise of the activity was appropriate for the audience The level of expertise of the activity was appropriate for the audience Strongly Agree The level of expertise of the activity was appropriate for the audience Agree The level of expertise of the activity was appropriate for the audience Neutral The level of expertise of the activity was appropriate for the audience Disagree The level of expertise of the activity was appropriate for the audience Strongly Disagree The time allotted for the content covered in the activity was appropriate The time allotted for the content covered in the activity was appropriate Strongly Agree The time allotted for the content covered in the activity was appropriate Agree The time allotted for the content covered in the activity was appropriate Neutral The time allotted for the content covered in the activity was appropriate Disagree The time allotted for the content covered in the activity was appropriate Strongly Disagree Question Title * 5. Assessment of Learning Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree This presentation provided me with useful information This presentation provided me with useful information Strongly Agree This presentation provided me with useful information Agree This presentation provided me with useful information Neutral This presentation provided me with useful information Disagree This presentation provided me with useful information Strongly Disagree This presentation has contributed to my professional growth This presentation has contributed to my professional growth Strongly Agree This presentation has contributed to my professional growth Agree This presentation has contributed to my professional growth Neutral This presentation has contributed to my professional growth Disagree This presentation has contributed to my professional growth Strongly Disagree This presentation provided the knowledge and skills to make a difference in my work This presentation provided the knowledge and skills to make a difference in my work Strongly Agree This presentation provided the knowledge and skills to make a difference in my work Agree This presentation provided the knowledge and skills to make a difference in my work Neutral This presentation provided the knowledge and skills to make a difference in my work Disagree This presentation provided the knowledge and skills to make a difference in my work Strongly Disagree Question Title * 6. Was there a commercial bias in this presentation? Yes No Question Title * 7. Are there any other comments or suggestions that you would like to make concerning this presentation? Question Title * 8. Topic/speaker Recommendation for future Annual Meeting activities: Next