Skip to content

2023 endMS Summer School Evaluation: Tuesday, June 20 - PM  Workshops

Tuesday, June 20

Please take a few minutes to share your impressions about today's sessions. Your feedback is very important to us and will help improve our future programming. All information provided will remain anonymous and, with the exception of comments which may be quoted anonymously, all results will be aggregated for dissemination. Thank you in advance for providing your feedback by end of week, Friday, June 23rd!
1.Have you attended an endMS Summer School before this year?
2.Which of the following categories best describe your current training/research focus (check all that apply):
3.Are you a:
4.Demystifying bioinformatics: introduction to RNA-seq analysis in R - Félix  Distéfano-Gagné

To what extent do you agree with the following statements about the teaching/facilitation of the session above?
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
was well prepared
provided clear explanations
was easy to follow
answered questions fully and directly
engaged participants
generated a desire to learn
held my attention
5.Comments regarding what worked well for this session/workshop/facilitators?
6.Comments and suggestions for improvements for this session/workshop/facilitators:
7.Demystifying genome editing - Dr. Jacques P Tremblay

To what extent do you agree with the following statements about the teaching/facilitation of the session above?
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
was well prepared
provided clear explanations
was easy to follow
answered questions fully and directly
engaged participants
generated a desire to learn
held my attention
8.Comments regarding what worked well for this session/workshop/facilitators?
9.Comments and suggestions for improvements for this session/workshop/facilitators:
10.Demystifying human ethics approval and informed consent - Dr. Nathalie Arbour

To what extent do you agree with the following statements about the teaching/facilitation of the session above?
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
was well prepared
provided clear explanations
was easy to follow
answered questions fully and directly
engaged participants
generated a desire to learn
held my attention
11.Comments regarding what worked well for this session/workshop/facilitators?
12.Comments and suggestions for improvements for this session/workshop/facilitators:
13.Taking into account our unconscious biases to foster inclusive work and research environments - Geneviève Lapointe and Catherine Talbot-Bercier

To what extent do you agree with the following statements about the teaching/facilitation of the session above?
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
N/A
was well prepared
provided clear explanations
was easy to follow
answered questions fully and directly
engaged participants
generated a desire to learn
held my attention
14.Comments regarding what worked well for this session/workshop/facilitators?
15.Comments and suggestions for improvements for this session/workshop/facilitators:
Thank you for providing your feedback! Your responses are extremely important for the training program, the presenters, this year's Summer School hosts and for future Summer School programming. The results and any constructive feedback will also be shared with the presenter/facilitator.