CSSA Annual Steward Meeting 2015 - Feedback Question Title * 1. Overall, how productive was the meeting, i.e., did the discussion yield clear information on program performance, fee setting methodology, fee schedules etc.? Extremely productive Very productive Somewhat productive Not that productive Not at all productive Question Title * 2. Please explain your reason(s) for your rating concerning the overall meeting in the previous question. Question Title * 3. Please rate the following statements regarding the meeting’s content and its organization. The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting. The meeting’s objectives were met. Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting. The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand. Meeting partisipants were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions. Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s). Your contribution was listened to and respected Strongly agree Strongly agree The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting. Strongly agree The meeting’s objectives were met. Strongly agree Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting. Strongly agree The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand. Strongly agree Meeting partisipants were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions. Strongly agree Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s). Strongly agree Your contribution was listened to and respected Agree Agree The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting. Agree The meeting’s objectives were met. Agree Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting. Agree The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand. Agree Meeting partisipants were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions. Agree Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s). Agree Your contribution was listened to and respected Not sure Not sure The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting. Not sure The meeting’s objectives were met. Not sure Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting. Not sure The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand. Not sure Meeting partisipants were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions. Not sure Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s). Not sure Your contribution was listened to and respected Disagree Disagree The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting. Disagree The meeting’s objectives were met. Disagree Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting. Disagree The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand. Disagree Meeting partisipants were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions. Disagree Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s). Disagree Your contribution was listened to and respected Strongly disagree Strongly disagree The meeting’s objectives were clearly communicated at the meeting. Strongly disagree The meeting’s objectives were met. Strongly disagree Registrants were provided with adequate information prior to the meeting. Strongly disagree The information delivered at the meeting was easy to follow and understand. Strongly disagree Meeting partisipants were given ample opportunity to participate and ask questions. Strongly disagree Your questions were adequately answered by the speaker(s). Strongly disagree Your contribution was listened to and respected Question Title * 4. What did you find most effective about the meeting, i.e., what aspects of the meeting were most successful? And what did you find least effective? Question Title * 5. What suggestions do you have about how to improve the effectiveness of these meetings in the future? Question Title * 6. Overall, how would you rate this webinar? Excellent Very good Good Poor Very Poor Question Title * 7. Pre-Read DocumentIn advance of the Annual Steward Meeting, CSSA distributed a pre-read document that provided information on program and financial performance, and the budgets and fees for 2016 for MMBC, MMSW, MMSM and Stewardship Ontario. We would like to obtain some feedback on the pre-read document and invite you to submit any suggestions for future pre-reads.Overall, how useful was the pre-read? Did it provide you with clear information on program performance, fee schedules etc? Extremely useful Very useful Somewhat useful Not that useful Not at all useful Question Title * 8. What information in the pre-read did you find most useful and why? Question Title * 9. What contents in the pre-read did you find least useful and why? Question Title * 10. What information/contents were not included in the pre-read which you would like to see in future pre-reads? Done