2025 AGPA Institute Observer Evaluation Form

Instructor/Leader(s)
Title of Institute
Observed for (length of time)
Observer
Date of Observation
I. Please rate for all groups when seen during time of observation
Not Well
Extremely Well
N/A
Manages boundaries
Attends to contact / learning objectives
Establishes safety
Promotes cohesion
Focuses on here-and-now
Explores the there-and-then (outside of group material)
Attends to Group-as-a-whole-process
Attends to inter-personal process
Attends to intrapsychic process
Explores transference
Explores resistance
Explores conflict
Explores scapegoating
Welcomes leadership challenges
II. Please rate for all groups when seen during time of observation
Not Well
Extremely Well
N/A
Maintains Institute fomat
Manages / makes use of group process
Pursues stated learning objectives
Demonstrates subject expertise
Effectively balances cognitive & emotional learning
III. Overall Assessment - complete for all groups
Poor
Excellent
N/A
Emotional sensitivity / empathic attunement of leader
Works well with co-leader
Overall level of group engagement
Overall, rate how well this group was conducted
IV. Other aspects - complete for all groups
Poor
Excellent
N/A
Group size
Room size
Room temperature
Noise level
Were there any important elements conspicuously missing during your observation?
Please describe them:
What was the gender balance of the group?
What was the diversity (e.g. age, ethnicity, nationality, disability, sexual identity/orientation) balance of the group?
V. Table Group Participation - Leader 1
Poor
Excellent
N/A
Attendance at meetings
Level of openness vs defensiveness
Effectiveness of communication about their group's process
Engagement with tablemates
Engagement with consultants
V. Table Group Participation - Leader 2
Poor
Excellent
N/A
Attendance at meetings
Level of openness vs defensiveness
Effectiveness of communication about their group's process
Engagement with tablemates
Engagement with consultants
VI. Suitability for Institute Leadership (Leader 1)
If yes, please describe:
VI. Suitability for Institute Leadership (Leader 2)
If yes, please describe:
VII. Please add comments