Skip to content
2013 SAEM AM Didactic - DS028
10.
Choosing a High-Impact Resident or Student Quality Improvement Project and Getting it Published
1.
Goals/Objectives of session were clear and accomplished.
Yes
No
2.
Speakers were knowledgeable with teaching skills that were appropriate for the subject.
Yes
No
3.
Probability of changing practice due to these presentations?
High
Low
No Change Necessary
------------>
High
Low
No Change Necessary
What would you change or consider changing?
4.
Jeremiah Schuur, MD, MHS
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
5.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
6.
Comments for Jeremiah Schuur, MD, MHS
7.
John J. Kelly, DO, FACEP
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
8.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
9.
Comments for John J. Kelly, DO, FACEP
10.
Arjun Venkatesh, MD, MBA
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
11.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
12.
Comments for Arjun Venkatesh, MD, MBA
