Skip to content
2013 SAEM AM Didactic - DS026
2.
LGBT Health: Educating EM Physicians to Provide Equitable and Quality Care
1.
Goals/Objectives of session were clear and accomplished.
Yes
No
2.
Speakers were knowledgeable with teaching skills that were appropriate for the subject.
Yes
No
3.
Probability of changing practice due to these presentations?
High
Low
No Change Necessary
------------>
High
Low
No Change Necessary
What would you change or consider changing?
4.
Paul Krieger, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
5.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
6.
Comments for Paul Krieger, MD
7.
Joel Moll, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
8.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
9.
Comments for Joel Moll, MD
10.
Thea James, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
11.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
12.
Comments for Thea James, MD
13.
Ellen Slaven, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
14.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
15.
Comments for Ellen Slaven, MD
16.
Ted Corbin, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
17.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
18.
Comments for Ted Corbin, MD
