1.Which of the following challenges advanced by Jarkesy's legal team do you find convincing? (You can choose one option, multiple options, or none of them)

The "nondelegation" challenge — The SEC is taking legislative power that it is not constitutionally granted

The "public rights" challenge — The SEC is limited in its ability to choose the venue for trying cases like Jarkesy's

The "unitary executive" challenge — A panel that reviews the dismissal of administrative law judges violates precedent by creating multiple protections for judges

2.Is there anything you want to add to your response?