Private Lands Leadership Academy Evaluation Survey

1.The virtual meeting format was appropriate for the content presented.

2.The NRCS Programs for Private Lands presentation provided me with a clear understanding of the relevant programs available to landowners.

3.The NRCS Programs presenter, Canton Ford, was knowledgeable, well-prepared, and effective in presenting the material.

4.The Partners for Wildlife presentation provided me with a clear understanding of how USFWS programming supports private lands conservation projects.

5.The Partners for Wildlife presenter, Jonathan Baxter, was knowledgeable, well-prepared, and effective in presenting the material.

6.The AGFC presentation provided me with a clear understanding about relevant state programs that support private lands conservation projects.

7.The AGFC Programs presenter, Randy Brents, was knowledgeable, well-prepared, and effective in presenting the material.

8.The Forest Certification and Forest Metrics presentation provided me a clear understanding of the benefits of forest certification, the importance of collaborating with certified foresters, and the common metrics used to characterize forests in Arkansas.

9.The Forestry Certifications presenter, Jaret Rushing, was knowledgeable, well-prepared, and effective in presenting the material.

10.The facilitated activity improved my understanding about the most common NRCS conservation practices implemented on wildlife habitat projects in Arkansas.

11.The preparatory assignment improved my understanding and prepared me for the content presented in Module 2: Building the Conservation Delivery Toolbox.

14.Which component(s) of Module 2: Building the Conservation Toolbox provided the most value to you?

15.Which component(s) of Module 2: Building the Conservation Delivery Toolbox could we improve on?

Private Lands Leadership Academy Evaluation Survey - Module 2