Skip to content
2013 SAEM AM Didactic - DS035
6.
The Great Pediatric Sedation Debate!
1.
Goals/Objectives of session were clear and accomplished.
Yes
No
2.
Speakers were knowledgeable with teaching skills that were appropriate for the subject.
Yes
No
3.
Probability of changing practice due to these presentations?
High
Low
No Change Necessary
------------>
High
Low
No Change Necessary
What would you change or consider changing?
4.
Amy Drendel, DO, MS
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
5.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
6.
Comments for Amy Drendel, DO, MS
7.
Frank Petruzella, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
8.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
9.
Comments for Frank Petruzella, MD
10.
Patrick Solari, MD
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
11.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
12.
Comments for Patrick Solari, MD
13.
Rakesh Mistry, MD, MS
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
14.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
15.
Comments for Rakesh Mistry, MD, MS
16.
Robert Kennedy
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Delivery
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Content
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Syllabus/Handouts
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
Practical Value
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Not Applicable
17.
Was there bias in this presentation?
No
Yes (please specify)
18.
Comments for Robert Kennedy
