Life Sciences Symposium Survey: May 20, 2025

Thank you for attending the inaugural Life Sciences Symposium! Your feedback is valuable to us. Please complete the following survey so that we may improve upon future events and tailor our programs to best meet your needs.

Please note, completion of this survey is required for CLE credit.

Thank you for your participation.

Question Title

* 1. Overall, how satisfied were you with the program?

Very satisfied

Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied

Question Title

* 2. The course topics were interesting and relevant to my work.

Strongly agree

Agree

Neither agree nor disagree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Question Title

* 3. Why did you attend the seminar? (check all that apply)

Interest in topics

Essential for your job

Educational requirement (CLE)

Networking opportunity

Question Title

* 4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

	Very Satisfied	Satisfied	Neutral	Dissatisfied	Very Dissatisfied
Marketing Communications & Process	Marketing Communications & Process Very Satisfied	Marketing Communications & Process Satisfied	Marketing Communications & Process Neutral	Marketing Communications & Process Dissatisfied	Marketing Communications & Process Very Dissatisfied
Program Length	Program Length Very Satisfied	Program Length Satisfied	Program Length Neutral	Program Length Dissatisfied	Program Length Very Dissatisfied
Course Materials	Course Materials Very Satisfied	Course Materials Satisfied	Course Materials Neutral	Course Materials Dissatisfied	Course Materials Very Dissatisfied
Takeaway Item	Takeaway Item Very Satisfied	Takeaway Item Satisfied	Takeaway Item Neutral	Takeaway Item Dissatisfied	Takeaway Item Very Dissatisfied

Question Title

* 5. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

	Very Satisfied	Satisfied	Neutral	Dissatisfied	Very Dissatisfied
Location	Location Very Satisfied	Location Satisfied	Location Neutral	Location Dissatisfied	Location Very Dissatisfied
On-site Facilities	On-site Facilities Very Satisfied	On-site Facilities Satisfied	On-site Facilities Neutral	On-site Facilities Dissatisfied	On-site Facilities Very Dissatisfied
A/V	A/V Very Satisfied	A/V Satisfied	A/V Neutral	A/V Dissatisfied	A/V Very Dissatisfied
Food & Beverage	Food & Beverage Very Satisfied	Food & Beverage Satisfied	Food & Beverage Neutral	Food & Beverage Dissatisfied	Food & Beverage Very Dissatisfied

Question Title

* 6. Session 1 – State of the States: State Transparency and Compliance Considerations presented by Sara R. Simon and Grant Ostlund.

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge?	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Excellent	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Very Good	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Average	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Fair	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Poor
How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion?	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Excellent	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Very Good	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Average	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Fair	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Poor
How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters?	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Excellent	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Very Good	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Average	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Fair	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Poor

Additional feedback:

Question Title

* 7. Session 2 – Balancing Innovation and Compliance in the Data Privacy Matrix presented by Alfred R. Brunetti.

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge?	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Excellent	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Very Good	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Average	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Fair	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Poor
How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion?	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Excellent	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Very Good	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Average	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Fair	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Poor
How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter?	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Excellent	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Very Good	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Average	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Fair	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Poor

Additional feedback:

Question Title

* 8. Session 3 – Navigating Investigations in Life Sciences (2025) presented by Martin J. Healy.

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge?	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Excellent	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Very Good	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Average	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Fair	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Poor
How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion?	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Excellent	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Very Good	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Average	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Fair	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Poor
How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter?	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Excellent	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Very Good	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Average	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Fair	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter? Poor

Additional feedback:

Question Title

* 9. Session 4 – Pharma and Med Device Compliance Panel presented by Jennifer A. Romanski, Jeffrey Kawalek, Gil Rodriguera, and Daniel Spicehandler.

	Excellent	Very Good	Average	Fair	Poor
How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge?	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Excellent	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Very Good	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Average	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Fair	How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge? Poor
How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion?	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Excellent	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Very Good	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Average	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Fair	How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion? Poor
How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters?	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Excellent	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Very Good	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Average	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Fair	How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters? Poor

Additional feedback:

Question Title

* 10. How likely are you to attend future Life Science Symposiums?

Very likely

Likely

Neither likely nor unlikely

Unlikely

Very unlikely

Question Title

* 11. How likely are you to recommend this event to a friend or colleague?

Very likely

Likely

Neither likely nor unlikely

Unlikely

Very unlikely

Question Title

* 12. How did you learn of our event?

Porzio Invitation

Friend/Colleague

Search Engine

Other (please specify)

Life Sciences Symposium Survey: May 20, 2025

Question Title

* 1. Overall, how satisfied were you with the program?

Question Title

* 2. The course topics were interesting and relevant to my work.

Question Title

* 3. Why did you attend the seminar? (check all that apply)

Question Title

* 4. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Question Title

* 5. Please rate your satisfaction with the following:

Question Title

* 6. Session 1 – State of the States: State Transparency and Compliance Considerations presented by Sara R. Simon and Grant Ostlund.

Question Title

* 7. Session 2 – Balancing Innovation and Compliance in the Data Privacy Matrix presented by Alfred R. Brunetti.

Question Title

* 8. Session 3 – Navigating Investigations in Life Sciences (2025) presented by Martin J. Healy.

Question Title

* 9. Session 4 – Pharma and Med Device Compliance Panel presented by Jennifer A. Romanski, Jeffrey Kawalek, Gil Rodriguera, and Daniel Spicehandler.

Question Title

* 10. How likely are you to attend future Life Science Symposiums?

Question Title

* 11. How likely are you to recommend this event to a friend or colleague?

Question Title

* 12. How did you learn of our event?

Question Title

* 13. Please share insights or topics of interest for future presentations.

Question Title

* 14. Please share your feedback! What did you like most about today's event? Do you have any suggestions for improving our symposium?

Question Title

* 15. Please share your name (for CLE purposes)