Skip to content

Life Sciences Symposium Survey: May 20, 2025

Thank you for attending the inaugural Life Sciences Symposium! Your feedback is valuable to us. Please complete the following survey so that we may improve upon future events and tailor our programs to best meet your needs.

Please note, completion of this survey is required for CLE credit.

Thank you for your participation.
1.Overall, how satisfied were you with the program?(Required.)
2.The course topics were interesting and relevant to my work.(Required.)
3.Why did you attend the seminar? (check all that apply)(Required.)
4.Please rate your satisfaction with the following:(Required.)
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Marketing Communications & Process
Program Length
Course Materials
Takeaway Item
5.Please rate your satisfaction with the following:(Required.)
Very Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Location
On-site Facilities 
A/V
Food & Beverage
6.Session 1 – State of the States: State Transparency and Compliance Considerations presented by Sara R. Simon and Grant Ostlund.(Required.)
Excellent
Very Good
Average
Fair
Poor
How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge?       
How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion?
How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters?
7.Session 2 – Balancing Innovation and Compliance in the Data Privacy Matrix presented by Alfred R. Brunetti.(Required.)
Excellent
Very Good
Average
Fair
Poor
How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge?       
How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion?
How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter?
8.Session 3 – Navigating Investigations in Life Sciences (2025) presented by Martin J. Healy.(Required.)
Excellent
Very Good
Average
Fair
Poor
How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge?       
How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion?
How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenter?
9.Session 4 – Pharma and Med Device Compliance Panel presented by Jennifer A. Romanski, Jeffrey Kawalek, Gil Rodriguera, and Daniel Spicehandler.(Required.)
Excellent
Very Good
Average
Fair
Poor
How useful was the program in enhancing your knowledge?       
How would you rate the balance between presentation of information and opportunities for questions and discussion?
How would you rate the content knowledge and preparedness of the presenters?
10.How likely are you to attend future Life Science Symposiums?(Required.)
11.How likely are you to recommend this event to a friend or colleague?(Required.)
12.How did you learn of our event?(Required.)
13.Please share insights or topics of interest for future presentations.(Required.)
14.Please share your feedback! What did you like most about today's event? Do you have any suggestions for improving our symposium?
15.Please share your name (for CLE purposes)(Required.)