Traditional Knowledge Guidelines Review Survey

100%
The Mackenzie Valley Review Board and the Land and Water Boards (the Boards) of the Mackenzie Valley are working together to update the Guidelines for Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment. The Review Board developed the Guidelines in 2005, and the Land and Water Boards adopted it in 2021. Traditional Knowledge is a legislated and foundational component of resource co-management in the Mackenzie Valley. It helps the Boards understand and address potential environmental, social, and cultural impacts. This survey seeks feedback to determine the scope, priorities and process for updating the Traditional Knowledge Guidelines.

The survey:
  • is open to anyone interested or participates in land use permitting, water licensing, and environmental assessments;
  • includes mostly open-ended questions to gather your input;
  • can be saved and completed later before the survey deadline;
  • closes on August 6, 2026;
  • takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes to complete.
Section 1: Scope of the Update
1.How extensive should the update be?
Section 2: Priorities and Content
2.What topics would you like to see included in an updated version of the Guidelines?
3.How would you prioritize these topics?
Section 3: Participation in the Review Process
4.How would you like to provide input and participate in the update process? (e.g., participating in focus groups, attending workshops, reviewing draft documents, etc.)
5.What is the best way to share information with you during the update process?
6.If you would like to receive updates and notifications during the update process, please provide your details below for our distribution list.
Privacy note: Contact information will only be used to share information about the update process and handled with privacy requirements.
7.Are there any individuals, groups, or organizations that are essential to engage with during this update process?
Final Question
8.Is there anything else you would like the Boards to consider when reviewing the Traditional Knowledge Guidelines?