Skip to content
IoTSF Regulatory Watch survey 2026
Company & product context
1.
In which country is your company headquartered?
2.
In which country are you based?
3.
What type of organization do you represent?
Product manufacturer
Component / module supplier
Importer / distributor / vendor
Software provider
Service provider
Testing / certification body
Consultancy
Other
4.
Approximately how large is your organization?
1–49 employees
50–249
250–999
1,000+
5.
Which sectors do your products primarily serve?
Consumer IoT
Industrial IoT
Automotive
Smart building
Healthcare
Defence
Other
6.
In which geographic markets do you currently sell or plan to sell connected products?
Australia
Brazil
Canada
China
EU/EEA
India
Japan
Singapore
South Korea
UK
USA
Other
Regulatory exposure & awareness
7.
Do you know which cybersecurity regulations, standards, or labeling schemes are relevant to you?
I'm very familiar
I'm familiar
I'm somewhat familiar
I'm unfamiliar
I require support
N/A
I'm very familiar
I'm familiar
I'm somewhat familiar
I'm unfamiliar
I require support
N/A
8.
Which cybersecurity regulations, standards, or labeling schemes do you consider relevant to your products?
EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
UK PSTI
EU RED cybersecurity requirements
US cybersecurity requirements / US Cybersecurity Trust Mark
Singapore Cybersecurity Labeling Scheme
Japan JC-STAR
South Korean requirements
Chinese cybersecurity requirements
Unsure
Other
9.
How confident are you that you understand the cybersecurity regulatory requirements applicable to your products?
Very confident
Somewhat confident
Neutral
Somewhat not confident
Not at all confident
Very confident
Somewhat confident
Neutral
Somewhat not confident
Not at all confident
10.
How difficult is it for your organization to identify which cybersecurity requirements apply to a product?
Very easy
Easy
Neutral
Difficult
Very easy
Easy
Neutral
Difficult
11.
Which sources do you primarily rely on to understand regulatory requirements?
IoT Security Foundation
Regulators/government guidance
Standards bodies
Testing/certification organizations
Legal/compliance advisers
Other industry associations
Customers
Internal expertise
Other
12.
Do you have existing relationships with security providers to outsource regulatory requirements?
No
Yes (please specify)
Where the real challenges are
13.
Which geographic markets present the greatest cybersecurity compliance challenges for your organization?
Australia
Brazil
Canada
EU/EEA
China
India
Japan
Singapore
South Korea
UK
USA
Other
14.
How are mutual recognition agreements supporting new market entries?
15.
What makes these markets particularly challenging?
Requirements are unclear
Requirements change frequently
Requirements conflict with other regulatory frameworks
Testing / certification requirements
Documentation requirements
Software / SBoM requirements
Vulnerability management requirements
Product labeling requirements
Lack of local guidance/expertise
Cost of compliance
Time required for compliance
Other
16.
Have cybersecurity requirements ever made it significantly more difficult to launch a product in a particular market?
Yes
No
Not sure
17.
If yes, which market and requirement caused the difficulty?
18.
Did you rely on external support to comply with cybersecurity regulations?
Yes
No
Not sure
19.
Have cybersecurity requirements ever caused your organization to:
Delay a product launch
Redesign a product
Change software or architecture
Add security functionality
Change suppliers/components
Introduce additional testing
Increase documentation
Change internal procedures
Decide not to enter a market
Other (please specify)
20.
Have you ever decided not to sell a product in a particular country or region because cybersecurity compliance was too difficult or costly?
No
Not sure
Yes (please specify)
21.
Which regulatory requirement or activity currently creates the greatest compliance burden for your organization?
EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
UK PSTI
EU RED cybersecurity requirements
US cybersecurity requirements / US Cybersecurity Trust Mark
Singapore Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme
Japan JC-STAR
South Korean requirements
Chinese cybersecurity requirements
Unsure
Other
Impact on product development
22.
At what stage are cybersecurity regulatory requirements typically considered in your organisation?
Product concept
Requirements/design
Development
Testing
Pre-market certification/compliance
Only after a compliance issue arises
23.
How significantly do cybersecurity regulations affect your product development process?
Very significantly
Significantly
Somewhat significantly
Not very significantly
Not at all
Very significantly
Significantly
Somewhat significantly
Not very significantly
Not at all
24.
Which parts of product development are most affected?
Hardware/component selection
Product architecture and design
Software development practices
Build and release processes
Software/firmware updates
Software authenticity and integrity
Component and supply-chain management
Vulnerability management
Testing and certification
Documentation and evidence
Post-market support
Other
25.
Have regulatory requirements increased the time required to bring products to market?
Significantly
Somewhat
No meaningful impact
Unsure
26.
Which activities have you introduced or significantly changed in response to cybersecurity regulation?
Security requirements during product design
Development and testing practices
Software build and release controls
Software/firmware update processes
Component and supplier controls
Vulnerability monitoring and response
Compliance documentation
Independent testing/certification
Other
None
27.
What is the single biggest regulatory challenge your product development teams face today?
28.
Have additional security efforts resulted in advantages or efficiencies?
No
Not sure
Yes (please specify)
Enforcement versus requirements on paper
29.
In which markets have you experienced cybersecurity requirements being actively checked or enforced?
Australia
Brazil
Canada
China
EU/EEA
India
Japan
Singapore
South Korea
UK
US
Other
30.
In which markets have you encountered requirements that formally apply but appear to have little or no practical enforcement?
Australia
Brazil
Canada
China
EU/EEA
India
Japan
Singapore
South Korea
UK
US
Other
31.
Does the expected level of enforcement affect how your organization prioritizes compliance activities?
Significantly
Somewhat
Not at all
Prefer not to say
32.
In your experience, which markets have the clearest and most predictable approach to cybersecurity compliance?
Australia
Brazil
Canada
China
EU/EEA
India
Japan
Singapore
South Korea
UK
US
Other
Looking forward
33.
Which upcoming or changing cybersecurity requirements are you most concerned about over the next 2–3 years?
34.
Where would greater regulatory harmonization across legal boundries provide the most value?
Security requirements
Testing
Certification
Labeling
SBoM requirements
Vulnerability disclosure
Software update obligations
Documentation
Mutual recognition between countries
Other (please specify)
35.
What would make global cybersecurity compliance easier for your organization?
36.
Is there a country, regulation, or cybersecurity requirement that you believe the
IoT Security Foundation
should investigate in more detail?
37.
Where can the
IoT Security Foundation
better support you?