We hope you have enjoyed reflecting on the Conference and that you will take your findings and experiences in Sydney with you into the future. In order to provide feedback to the organisers and for the next Conference we would really appreciate you answering these short online questions.

 
Please rate the following on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest.

Question Title

* 1. Meeting Scientific Program

  Completely Disagree Disagree Neither agree or Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
The program fulfilled my expectations
The topics were of value to me
The themes were appropriate
High quality plenary speakers 
High quality of parallel session presenters
Perfect length of the sessions
High quality of Pre Conference Workshops
The number of concurrent sessions was appropriate
Excellent Chairing of your session
Perfect ability to move between parallel sessions

Question Title

* 2. Meeting Abstract Process

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent
Ease of Abstract submission process
Abstract notification
Abstracts timetabling and notification of presentation details
Assistance with your questions regarding your abstract presentation

Question Title

* 3. Conference Catering 

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 
Breakfast
Morning Tea
Lunch
Afternoon Tea

Question Title

* 4. Welcome Reception – Sunday 24 September - Great Hall, University of Sydney 

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent
Catering
Location
Entertainment 

Question Title

* 5. Conference dinner - Wednesday 27 September - Doltone House Jones Bay Wharf 

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 
Catering
Location
Entertainment
Transport 

Question Title

* 6. SNRN Activities

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 
Early Morning Sessions (Grant Writing and Funding: Non-traditional Careers
SNRN Aussie BBQ
Connection Corner (Careers Meet and Greet; Meet the Editor)

Question Title

* 7. Policy: did you attend any session that had a policy discussion?

Question Title

* 8. If YES, did you find the discussion generally:

Question Title

* 9. Ethics: did you attend at least one session that had an ethics discussion?

Question Title

* 10. If YES, did you find the discussion generally:

Question Title

* 11. Meeting Planning

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 
Conference location (Sydney)
Conference venue (University of Sydney)
Poster space accommodation (MacLaurin Hall)

Question Title

* 12. Meeting Delivery

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 
Conference information and updates via newsletters
Program and abstract information and updates via website
Program and abstract information and updates via newsletters
Pocket Program
Name Tag Formatting (e.g., large first name)
Full Abstracts Book
Satchel
Notebook
Childcare 

Question Title

* 13. Meeting information

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 
Provision of information prior to the Conference
Provision of information in response to your questions
Registration procedures
Registration desk during the Conference
Opportunities for Networking while at the meeting

Question Title

* 14. Meeting Components

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 
Scientific Program
Social Program

Question Title

* 15. Accommodation

  Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 
Good range of options provided through the Secretariat
Assistance with any questions and information provided
Overall satisfaction with the hotel booked

Question Title

* 16. How did you hear about the Conference?

Question Title

* 17. What was your favourite part of the Conference?

Question Title

* 18. What was your least favourite part of the Conference?

Question Title

* 19. What would have improved the Conference for you?

Question Title

* 20. Please provide any constructive comments that may be helpful to the SNRN when organising future conference activities for students and new researchers

Question Title

* 21. What other activities would you recommend for the ISEE Policy Committee?

Question Title

* 22. Can you name the ethics discussant(s) and rate his/her/their performance (list if more than one) from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent)? 1 - Poor 2 - Fair 3 - Good 4 - Very Good 5 – Excellent

Question Title

* 23. Please provide any constructive suggestions that may be helpful to future Conference organisers

T