IDATA Mentor Log Question Title * 1. Mentor Name 1- Katya Gozman 2- Chris Matthews 3- Kendall Mehling 4- Andrea Salazar 5- Ben Shafer 6- Alex Traub 7- Kathy Gustavson 8- Kate Meredith 9- Tia Bertz 10- Sophia Vlahakis Question Title * 2. Date of session in Month, Date, Year format Please enter the date of the session. Date Question Title * 3. Please write down the approximate start and end times of the session in Hour, Minute, AM/PM format. Start of session Time AM/PM - AM PM End of session Time AM/PM - AM PM Question Title * 4. Which IDATA teacher did you work with? 1- Jaqueline Barge 2- Neal Boys 3- Tim Fahlberg 4- Kristen Grender 5- Kevin McCarron 6- Matthew McCutcheon 7- Tina Mekeel 8- Elizabeth Ramseyer 9- Barbara Stachelski 10- David Lockett 11- Holly Bensel 12- Michael Prokosch 13- Rick Sanchez 14- Caroline Odden 15- Kara Rowbotham 16- Amanda Allen More than one teacher or anyone else not listed: Question Title * 5. Did you attend the session face-to-face, or virtually? Face-to-face (i.e., physically present at the session) Virtually (e.g., via Zoom, Skype, or similar) Question Title * 6. How many students participated? Question Title * 7. Please provide a brief description of the activities that took place during the session. Question Title * 8. Interesting or Notable ExperiencesNow we’d like you to help us capture specific descriptions and quotes of what students say or do that get at the essence of what they’re experiencing or learning in the areas of astronomy, computing, accessibility, and STEM+C interest or identity. As you think about these experiences feel free to answer any of the following questions.What are students especially interested in or curious about? What are they excited about? What’s especially challenging or frustrating to them? How do interactions among different students (BVI and sighted, etc.) make a difference?And what evidence is there of changes or learning in any of these areas? Question Title * 9. What are your thoughts/feeling about what you're noticing in class? Question Title * 10. My role in this classroom interaction involved (check all that apply) Primary role 1- Co-Teaching, Mentor took the lead 2- Co-Teaching, Teacher took the lead 3- Co-teaching, Shared the Lead 4- Observed 5- Assisted students 6- No other role Primary role menu Secondary role 1- Co-Teaching, Mentor took the lead 2- Co-Teaching, Teacher took the lead 3- Co-teaching, Shared the Lead 4- Observed 5- Assisted students 6- No other role Secondary role menu Question Title * 11. To what extent was each of these topics a focus of the session? Astronomy 1- Not part of the session 2- Mentioned once or twice 3- A minor focus of the session 4- A major focus of the session 5- The primary focus of the session Astronomy menu Computing 1- Not part of the session 2- Mentioned once or twice 3- A minor focus of the session 4- A major focus of the session 5- The primary focus of the session Computing menu Accessibility 1- Not part of the session 2- Mentioned once or twice 3- A minor focus of the session 4- A major focus of the session 5- The primary focus of the session Accessibility menu User-centered design 1- Not part of the session 2- Mentioned once or twice 3- A minor focus of the session 4- A major focus of the session 5- The primary focus of the session User-centered design menu STEM careers or interests 1- Not part of the session 2- Mentioned once or twice 3- A minor focus of the session 4- A major focus of the session 5- The primary focus of the session STEM careers or interests menu Question Title * 12. Please identify any project-provided resources that were used in the session: Resource 1 1- None or no other resources 2- CAEM 1 3- CAEM 2 4- CAEM 3 5- Hour of Code 6- Skynet Junior Scholars portal 7- Afterglow Access 8- Quorum resources 9- Github Resource 1 menu Resource 2 1- None or no other resources 2- CAEM 1 3- CAEM 2 4- CAEM 3 5- Hour of Code 6- Skynet Junior Scholars portal 7- Afterglow Access 8- Quorum resources 9- Github Resource 2 menu Resource 3 1- None or no other resources 2- CAEM 1 3- CAEM 2 4- CAEM 3 5- Hour of Code 6- Skynet Junior Scholars portal 7- Afterglow Access 8- Quorum resources 9- Github Resource 3 menu Any other resource that was not listed? Question Title * 13. Please list whether or not activities were structured in the following ways. As individuals 1- Not at all 2- Less than one quarter of the time 3- One quarter to one half of the time 4- One half to three quarters of the time 5- All or nearly all of the time As individuals menu As pairs 1- Not at all 2- Less than one quarter of the time 3- One quarter to one half of the time 4- One half to three quarters of the time 5- All or nearly all of the time As pairs menu As small groups 1- Not at all 2- Less than one quarter of the time 3- One quarter to one half of the time 4- One half to three quarters of the time 5- All or nearly all of the time As small groups menu As a whole group 1- Not at all 2- Less than one quarter of the time 3- One quarter to one half of the time 4- One half to three quarters of the time 5- All or nearly all of the time As a whole group menu Question Title * 14. How many students were actively engaged with session activities? 1- None or very few 2- Less than half of the students 3- Half to three-quarters of the students 4- More than three-quarter of the students 5- All or nearly all of the students Question Title * 15. How well do each of these descriptions characterize the session? Students participated in student-student talk 1- Not observed 2- Observed once or twice, but not a characteristic of the session 3- Somewhat or sometimes characteristic of the session 4- Often characteristic of the session 5- Almost always characteristic of the session Students participated in student-student talk menu Students engaged in project or inquiries of their own design 1- Not observed 2- Observed once or twice, but not a characteristic of the session 3- Somewhat or sometimes characteristic of the session 4- Often characteristic of the session 5- Almost always characteristic of the session Students engaged in project or inquiries of their own design menu Students used multiple strategies, approaches, or representations to solve problems 1- Not observed 2- Observed once or twice, but not a characteristic of the session 3- Somewhat or sometimes characteristic of the session 4- Often characteristic of the session 5- Almost always characteristic of the session Students used multiple strategies, approaches, or representations to solve problems menu Teacher created opportunities for students to respectfully discuss alternative conceptions 1- Not observed 2- Observed once or twice, but not a characteristic of the session 3- Somewhat or sometimes characteristic of the session 4- Often characteristic of the session 5- Almost always characteristic of the session Teacher created opportunities for students to respectfully discuss alternative conceptions menu Teacher questions supported students to deepen their understanding (not just skill development) 1- Not observed 2- Observed once or twice, but not a characteristic of the session 3- Somewhat or sometimes characteristic of the session 4- Often characteristic of the session 5- Almost always characteristic of the session Teacher questions supported students to deepen their understanding (not just skill development) menu Question Title * 16. In your opinion, what went well with this session? Question Title * 17. What were some challenges of this session? Question Title * 18. What are the next steps for you as a mentor? Question Title * 19. Anything else about the session that you'd like to share? Question Title * 20. What changes, if any, are you noticing in students? Question Title * 21. Please provide any comments or feedback you have about this log and how it could be designed to work better for you. Done