Cardiovascular Hemodynamics Lecture (PAC) - October 11th, 2013

1. Cardiovascular Hemodynamics Lecture II

Please evaluate the Critical Care presentation using this form. Your response are anonymous.

Question Title

1. The effectiveness of the session in achieving specific objectives:
Please indicate the extent to which the session achieved its stated goals by selecting the number that most closely corresponds to your opinion.

	Terrible	Poor	Fair	Good	Very good	Excellent	Outstanding	N/A
1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings	1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings Terrible	1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings Poor	1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings Fair	1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings Good	1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings Very good	1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings Excellent	1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings Outstanding	1. Understand the difference between PCWP vs PAOP and their meanings N/A
2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits	2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits Terrible	2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits Poor	2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits Fair	2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits Good	2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits Very good	2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits Excellent	2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits Outstanding	2. Describe the utility of the PAC and risk/benefits N/A
3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring	3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring Terrible	3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring Poor	3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring Fair	3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring Good	3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring Very good	3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring Excellent	3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring Outstanding	3. Describe the optimal process for PAC insertion and monitoring N/A
4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test	4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test Terrible	4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test Poor	4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test Fair	4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test Good	4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test Very good	4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test Excellent	4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test Outstanding	4. Understand how to perform and interpret the square – wave test N/A
5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS	5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS Terrible	5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS Poor	5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS Fair	5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS Good	5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS Very good	5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS Excellent	5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS Outstanding	5. Describe the primary findings of the FACTT ARDS study with regard to PAC use in ARDS N/A

Other (please specify)

Question Title

2. To evaluate the presenter, (Ivor Douglas, MD)please choose the number that most closely corresponds to your opinion. Circle “NA” if the statement is not applicable.

	Terrible	Poor	Fair	Good	Very good	Excellent	Outstanding	N/A
1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives)	1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives) Terrible	1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives) Poor	1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives) Fair	1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives) Good	1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives) Very good	1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives) Excellent	1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives) Outstanding	1. The introduction (of the speaker, format, and learning objectives) N/A
2. The content (relevance & appropriate level)	2. The content (relevance & appropriate level) Terrible	2. The content (relevance & appropriate level) Poor	2. The content (relevance & appropriate level) Fair	2. The content (relevance & appropriate level) Good	2. The content (relevance & appropriate level) Very good	2. The content (relevance & appropriate level) Excellent	2. The content (relevance & appropriate level) Outstanding	2. The content (relevance & appropriate level) N/A
3. The clarity and organization of the presentation	3. The clarity and organization of the presentation Terrible	3. The clarity and organization of the presentation Poor	3. The clarity and organization of the presentation Fair	3. The clarity and organization of the presentation Good	3. The clarity and organization of the presentation Very good	3. The clarity and organization of the presentation Excellent	3. The clarity and organization of the presentation Outstanding	3. The clarity and organization of the presentation N/A
4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation)	4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation) Terrible	4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation) Poor	4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation) Fair	4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation) Good	4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation) Very good	4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation) Excellent	4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation) Outstanding	4. Interaction with the audience (questions, discussion, other participation) N/A
5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs"	5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs" Terrible	5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs" Poor	5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs" Fair	5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs" Good	5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs" Very good	5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs" Excellent	5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs" Outstanding	5. Freedom from distractions, like pacing, fidgeting, use of “ums” and “ahs" N/A
6. Tone of voice, speech patterns	6. Tone of voice, speech patterns Terrible	6. Tone of voice, speech patterns Poor	6. Tone of voice, speech patterns Fair	6. Tone of voice, speech patterns Good	6. Tone of voice, speech patterns Very good	6. Tone of voice, speech patterns Excellent	6. Tone of voice, speech patterns Outstanding	6. Tone of voice, speech patterns N/A
7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest)	7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest) Terrible	7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest) Poor	7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest) Fair	7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest) Good	7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest) Very good	7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest) Excellent	7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest) Outstanding	7. Engagement of the audience (motivation, stimulation of interest) N/A
8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible)	8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible) Terrible	8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible) Poor	8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible) Fair	8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible) Good	8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible) Very good	8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible) Excellent	8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible) Outstanding	8. The audio visual aids (concise, clear and legible) N/A
9. Global evaluation	9. Global evaluation Terrible	9. Global evaluation Poor	9. Global evaluation Fair	9. Global evaluation Good	9. Global evaluation Very good	9. Global evaluation Excellent	9. Global evaluation Outstanding	9. Global evaluation N/A
10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups)	10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups) Terrible	10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups) Poor	10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups) Fair	10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups) Good	10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups) Very good	10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups) Excellent	10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups) Outstanding	10. The online lecture notes and handouts (Google groups) N/A

Question Title

3. What aspect(s) of this session was/were most helpful to your learning?

Question Title

4. What aspect(s) of this session was/were least helpful to your learning?

Question Title

5. Do you have any suggestions regarding how it could be improved?