Exit this survey Heart Institute Lecture Series - CME Series Evaluation - Fall/Winter 2018 Activity Director: Dunbar Ivy, MD, CME Coordinator: Renee Patilla Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) expectation is that professional continuing education will be designed to change learner's strategies (competence), or what learner's actually do in practice (performance), or the impact on the patient or on healthcare (patient outcomes).As a result of participating in the Heart Institute Lecture Series.... Question Title * 1. Has your Competence (you know the right thing to do) been reinforced or improved? Please briefly cite 1 or more examples. Question Title * 2. Are you leaving with ideas to improve your Performance (you do the right thing)? Please briefly cite 1 or more examples. Question Title * 3. This activity will improve my Patient Outcomes? Yes No If Yes, please comment Question Title * 4. General Conference Evaluation - Please RATE the degree to which the following statements were achieved. Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent Presented evidenced-based content applicable to practice Presented evidenced-based content applicable to practice Poor Presented evidenced-based content applicable to practice Fair Presented evidenced-based content applicable to practice Good Presented evidenced-based content applicable to practice Very Good Presented evidenced-based content applicable to practice Excellent Explored new ideas and resources Explored new ideas and resources Poor Explored new ideas and resources Fair Explored new ideas and resources Good Explored new ideas and resources Very Good Explored new ideas and resources Excellent Gained new knowledge Gained new knowledge Poor Gained new knowledge Fair Gained new knowledge Good Gained new knowledge Very Good Gained new knowledge Excellent Provided appropriate and effective opportunities for active learning (case studies, discussion, Q&A ,etc.) Provided appropriate and effective opportunities for active learning (case studies, discussion, Q&A ,etc.) Poor Provided appropriate and effective opportunities for active learning (case studies, discussion, Q&A ,etc.) Fair Provided appropriate and effective opportunities for active learning (case studies, discussion, Q&A ,etc.) Good Provided appropriate and effective opportunities for active learning (case studies, discussion, Q&A ,etc.) Very Good Provided appropriate and effective opportunities for active learning (case studies, discussion, Q&A ,etc.) Excellent Overall, this series is.. Overall, this series is.. Poor Overall, this series is.. Fair Overall, this series is.. Good Overall, this series is.. Very Good Overall, this series is.. Excellent Question Title * 5. Did you perceive any commercial bias for or against a specific product or company? Yes No If Yes, please comment Question Title * 6. Topics/Suggestions for future Heart Institute content within this series? Why is this topic important to your practice? Question Title * 7. Additional Comments or Areas for Improvement related to this CME Series Submit
