PBRF Sector Reference Group - Consultation Paper 8: Panels assessment criteria Survey

Question Title

* 1. Please provide your contact details. Note that no identifying personal data will be made public, but we may contact you to follow up on your responses.

Name *

Company *

Job title

Email Address *

Question Title

* 2. If you are responding on behalf of an organisation, please tell us the name of that organisation

Question Title

* 3. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your career stage (if applicable)

Early career

Mid career

Late career

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your ethnicity (and iwi/hapū if applicable)

Question Title

* 5. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your gender identity

Female

Male

Gender Diverse

Prefer not to say

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. Do you support the proposed revised EP component and tie-point descriptors?

Yes

Propose a different approach (please provide details below)

Any further comments are welcome

Question Title

* 7. Do you wish to suggest changes to the proposed component and tie-point wording? Note that a Word document containing the proposed wording is available on the TEC website to enable submission of detailed track changed suggestions.

Question Title

* 8. EP component weighting: which option do you support?

Option 1: Retain 70/30 weightings

Option 2: 60/40 weightings

Option 3: 80/20 weightings

Another approach (please provide details below)

Any further comments are welcome

Question Title

* 9. Do you support the proposed adjustments to the cross-referral guidance?

Yes

Another approach (please provide details below)

Any further comments are welcome

Question Title

* 10. Do you wish to suggest any changes to the proposed cross-referral guidance adjustments?

Question Title

* 11. Do you support the proposed adjustments to the holistic assessment guidelines, including the proposed EP calibration check?

Yes

Another approach or suggested changes (please provide details below)

Other (please specify)

PBRF Sector Reference Group - Consultation Paper 8: Panels assessment criteria

Question Title

* 1. Please provide your contact details. Note that no identifying personal data will be made public, but we may contact you to follow up on your responses.

Question Title

* 2. If you are responding on behalf of an organisation, please tell us the name of that organisation

Question Title

* 3. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your career stage (if applicable)

Question Title

* 4. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your ethnicity (and iwi/hapū if applicable)

Question Title

* 5. If you are responding on your own behalf, it would be helpful to know your gender identity

Question Title

* 6. Do you support the proposed revised EP component and tie-point descriptors?

Question Title

* 7. Do you wish to suggest changes to the proposed component and tie-point wording? Note that a Word document containing the proposed wording is available on the TEC website to enable submission of detailed track changed suggestions.

Question Title

* 8. EP component weighting: which option do you support?

Question Title

* 9. Do you support the proposed adjustments to the cross-referral guidance?

Question Title

* 10. Do you wish to suggest any changes to the proposed cross-referral guidance adjustments?

Question Title

* 11. Do you support the proposed adjustments to the holistic assessment guidelines, including the proposed EP calibration check?

Question Title

* 12. We welcome any comments on the TEC's intended approach to clarifying the subject area selection criteria

Question Title

* 13. We welcome any comments on the TEC's intended approach to EP calibration training

Question Title

* 14. We welcome any further comments on the proposals and options set out in Consultation Paper #8