2021-2022 Semester Course Evaluation and Integrated Student Outcomes

Semester Course Evaluation

Please submit feedback regarding the course you have just completed, including feedback on course structure, content, and instructor. Please repeat this survey for each class you have taken this semester.

Question Title

* 1. Semester?

Fall 2021

Spring 2022

Question Title

* 2. Class Name

Algebra I

Algebra I H

Algebra II

Algebra II H

AP Calculus

AP Chemistry

AP Computer Science A

AP Computer Science Principles

AP English 11

AP English 12

AP French

AP Human Geography

AP Latin

AP Physics

AP Research

AP Seminar

AP Spanish

AP Statistics

AP Studio Art

AP U.S. History

AP World History

AP U.S. Government

Biology

Biology H

Broadcast Journalism

Chemistry

Chemistry H

Choir- All Choir Courses

College Algebra

Community Health

Digital Photography 1-2

Digital Photography Honors 3-4

Drawing

Engineering

English 10

English 10 H

English 11

English 11 H

English 12

English 12 H

English 9

English 9 H

Financial Algebra

French I

French II

French III H

Geology

Geometry

Geometry H

Graphic Design & Printmaking

Health

Human Anatomy & Physiology

ILC (Academic Seminar)

Intro to Computer Science

Kinesiology I

Kinesiology II

Leadership

Mixed Media 1-2

Music & Technology

Painting

Physical Education (PE)

Physics H

Piano

Precalculus

Religion 10

Religion 11

Religion 12

Religion 9

Sculpture 1-2

Sculpture 3-4

Spanish I

Spanish II

Spanish III H

Theater

U.S. Government

U.S. History

Weights- Men's

Weights- Women's

World History

Yearbook

Study Hall

Question Title

* 3. Teacher Name

Coach Cass

Dr. Greenfield

Mr. Bedoy

Mr. Bischopink

Mr. Campbell

Mr. Charboneau

Mr. DeReutyer

Mr. Franklin

Mr. Frensdorff

Mr. Gardner

Mr. Ghilieri

Mr. Gibb

Mr. Glogovac

Mr. Heywood

Mr. Monsey

Mr. Nolan

Mr. Peregrin

Mr. Rodriguez

Mr. Smolinski

Mr. Werner

Mrs. Bavaro

Mrs. Brouhard

Mrs. Gant

Mrs. Kersten

Mrs. Lazarek

Mrs. Leblanc

Mrs. Ledesma-Smith

Mrs. Mechsner

Mrs. Schnaible

Mrs. Sexton

Ms. Anxo

Ms. Cella

Ms. French

Ms. Gwinn

Ms. Hilliard

Ms. Johnson

Ms. Lenton

Ms. Peterson

Ms. Thomas

Ms. Van Reynolds

Ms. Wallin

Ms. Walsh

Ms. Wieland

Ms. Torvenin

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. Student contribution to learning

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
My level of skill/knowledge at the start of this course was:	My level of skill/knowledge at the start of this course was: Poor	My level of skill/knowledge at the start of this course was: Fair	My level of skill/knowledge at the start of this course was: Good	My level of skill/knowledge at the start of this course was: Excellent
My level of skill/knowledge at the end of this course is:	My level of skill/knowledge at the end of this course is: Poor	My level of skill/knowledge at the end of this course is: Fair	My level of skill/knowledge at the end of this course is: Good	My level of skill/knowledge at the end of this course is: Excellent
My effort level in this course was:	My effort level in this course was: Poor	My effort level in this course was: Fair	My effort level in this course was: Good	My effort level in this course was: Excellent

Question Title

* 5. Skill and Responsiveness of the Teacher:

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	No Opinion	Agree	Strongly Agree
My teacher was an effective lecturer/demonstrator.	My teacher was an effective lecturer/demonstrator. Strongly Disagree	My teacher was an effective lecturer/demonstrator. Disagree	My teacher was an effective lecturer/demonstrator. No Opinion	My teacher was an effective lecturer/demonstrator. Agree	My teacher was an effective lecturer/demonstrator. Strongly Agree
My teacher's presentations were clear and organized.	My teacher's presentations were clear and organized. Strongly Disagree	My teacher's presentations were clear and organized. Disagree	My teacher's presentations were clear and organized. No Opinion	My teacher's presentations were clear and organized. Agree	My teacher's presentations were clear and organized. Strongly Agree
My teacher's lessons were engaging and interesting.	My teacher's lessons were engaging and interesting. Strongly Disagree	My teacher's lessons were engaging and interesting. Disagree	My teacher's lessons were engaging and interesting. No Opinion	My teacher's lessons were engaging and interesting. Agree	My teacher's lessons were engaging and interesting. Strongly Agree
My teacher used time effectively during class periods.	My teacher used time effectively during class periods. Strongly Disagree	My teacher used time effectively during class periods. Disagree	My teacher used time effectively during class periods. No Opinion	My teacher used time effectively during class periods. Agree	My teacher used time effectively during class periods. Strongly Agree
My teacher was available and helpful.	My teacher was available and helpful. Strongly Disagree	My teacher was available and helpful. Disagree	My teacher was available and helpful. No Opinion	My teacher was available and helpful. Agree	My teacher was available and helpful. Strongly Agree
My teacher's grading was prompt.	My teacher's grading was prompt. Strongly Disagree	My teacher's grading was prompt. Disagree	My teacher's grading was prompt. No Opinion	My teacher's grading was prompt. Agree	My teacher's grading was prompt. Strongly Agree
My teacher provided useful feedback on assignments.	My teacher provided useful feedback on assignments. Strongly Disagree	My teacher provided useful feedback on assignments. Disagree	My teacher provided useful feedback on assignments. No Opinion	My teacher provided useful feedback on assignments. Agree	My teacher provided useful feedback on assignments. Strongly Agree

Question Title

* 6. Course Content:

	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	No Opinion	Agree	Strongly Agree
Learning objectives were clear.	Learning objectives were clear. Strongly Disagree	Learning objectives were clear. Disagree	Learning objectives were clear. No Opinion	Learning objectives were clear. Agree	Learning objectives were clear. Strongly Agree
Course content was organized and well planned.	Course content was organized and well planned. Strongly Disagree	Course content was organized and well planned. Disagree	Course content was organized and well planned. No Opinion	Course content was organized and well planned. Agree	Course content was organized and well planned. Strongly Agree
Course workload was appropriate.	Course workload was appropriate. Strongly Disagree	Course workload was appropriate. Disagree	Course workload was appropriate. No Opinion	Course workload was appropriate. Agree	Course workload was appropriate. Strongly Agree
Course was organized to allow all students to participate fully.	Course was organized to allow all students to participate fully. Strongly Disagree	Course was organized to allow all students to participate fully. Disagree	Course was organized to allow all students to participate fully. No Opinion	Course was organized to allow all students to participate fully. Agree	Course was organized to allow all students to participate fully. Strongly Agree

2021-2022 Semester Course Evaluation and Integrated Student Outcomes

Semester Course Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. Semester?

Question Title

* 2. Class Name

Question Title

* 3. Teacher Name

Question Title

* 4. Student contribution to learning

Question Title

* 5. Skill and Responsiveness of the Teacher:

Question Title

* 6. Course Content:

Question Title

* 7. What aspects of this course were most useful or valuable?

Question Title

* 8. How would you improve this course?

Question Title

* 9. Why did you choose this course?