Exit this survey

The objective of this TM 2.0 Task Force is to provide public and private stakeholders with practical guidelines on how to facilitate TM 2.0 collaboration between stakeholders on a tactical level. The TF mainly works on new ideas integrating also the changing role of PA towards Service Provider.  

A Guidelines document with focus on the tactical level is under draft and we will take into account the outcome of the Survey.

Question Title

* 1. In which role is your organisation active in traffic management, and with which geographical scope?

Question Title

* 2. What capabilities and assets does your organisation have in place to perform traffic management?

Question Title

* 3. How are your traffic management strategies and plans developed?

Question Title

* 4. Can you explain to which extent (if any) your organisation is involved in Traffic Management collaboration between one or more road authorities and one or more service providers (TM2.0 collaboration)?

·         Below Level 0:
o   TM assets in place that have potential for TM2.0 collaboration (Current static systems, traffic state information, FCD collection)

·         Level 0:
o   TMP and FCD exchange, both optimise their own processes

·         TM2.0 Level 1:
o   Display or discard the public strategic route after evaluation by SP, User decides

·         TM2.0 Level 2:
o   Compulsory display as option of public strategic route, user decides

·         TM2.0 Level 3:
o   Mandatory takeover of public strategic route. RA decides

·         TM2.0 Level 4:
o   Load balanced routing, traffic will be distributed according to individual destinations and free capacity slot on different routes.

Question Title

* 5. If your organisation is involved in TM2.0 collaboration, could you explain which aspects (if any) of the figure below is involved in this collaboration?

Question Title

* 6. What are the motives of your organisation to (not) be involved in TM2.0 collaboration? What are your expectations of results of TM2.0 collaboration?

Question Title

* 7. Does the collaboration require your organisation to re-think traffic management related ways of working (processes), tasks and responsibilities? If so, how?

Question Title

* 8. Which challenges (if any) do these new forms of collaboration bring to your organisation, and how are they avoided/solved?

Question Title

* 9. If your organisation is already involved in TM2.0 collaboration, which recommendations would you have for road authorities and service providers being or getting involved in TM2.0 collaboration?

T