New scale (not in effect until the new guides are released):
 
0 = bottom 0.00000001%, no redeeming aesthetic qualities, basically no one is this ugly

0.5 = bottom 0.1% (1 out of 1,000), ultra unattractive. hunchback of notredame

1.0 = bottom 0.2% (1 out of 500), extremely unattractive. probably deformed looking, ugly, and obese

1.5 = bottom 0.4% (1 in 250). why are we even differentiating at this level

2.0 = bottom 1% (1 out of 100), very unattractive. worst looking in a large classroom. probably ugly and obese

2.5 = bottom 2% (1 in 50)

3.0 = bottom 5% (1 out of 20), unattractive. worst looking in a small classroom. ugly face, maybe overweight

3.5 = bottom 10% (1 in 10)

4.0 = bottom 25% (1 out of 4), low-tier average; everyday unattractive. worst looking in a small group

4.5 = bottom 35% (1 in ~3)

5.0 = 50%, average

5.5 = top 35% (1 in ~3)

6.0 = top 25% (1 out of 4), everyday good-looking. upper-tier average or best looking in a small group

6.5 = top 10% (1 in 10)

7.0 = top 5% (1 out of 20), well above average girl/guy next door. best looking in a small classroom

7.5 = top 2% (1 in 50)

8.0 = top 1% (1 out of 100). very attractive; model tier. best looking in a large classroom

8.5 = top 0.4% (1 in 250)

9.0 = top 0.2% (1 out of 500), extremely attractive, supermodel tier

9.5 = top 0.1% (1 out of 1,000), ultra attractive. top tier for each race

10 = top 0.00000001%, god-tier, basically no one meets this standard

Question Title

* 1. Men 9.0 choices (choose up to 12)

Question Title

* 2. Women 9.0 choices (choose up to 12)

Question Title

* 3. (Required) Please enter your Reddit username with your Voter ID, as pm'd to you earlier

Question Title

* 4. How did you find this survey? This shit was posted 4 years ago

T