ICS 2025 Delegate Workshop Evaluation
Thank you for taking the time to review the ICS 2025 Workshops.
This short evaluation form should only take 5-10mins to complete.
Anonymized responses will be provided to the ICS Education Committee and workshop Chairs following the event.
*
1.
Which workshop are you reviewing
(Required.)
Workshop 1, Hands-On Basic Urodynamics - An Interactive Workshop
Workshop 2, Breaking the Taboo of Incontinence. Culturally Responsive Approaches for Achieving Equitable Continence Care.
Workshop 3, Creating a Circle for IC/BPS: Combining Animal Models and Clinical Data and Artificial Intelligence to Improve Patient Management
Workshop 4, ICS CORE CURRICULUM (FREE) Pelvic Floor Exercises: How Many Repetitions Did You Say?
Workshop 5, Sexual Dysfunctions in People with Spinal Cord Injury
Workshop 6, Hands-on Adjustable Incontinence Devices for Men - a Practical Hands-on Workshop
Workshop 7, A Multidisciplinary Approach to Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI)
Workshop 8, Neurourology Workshop: Parkinsons and MSA, What Should We Know?
Workshop 9, Innovative Approaches for Underactive and/or Overactive Bladder in Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Men
Workshop 10, Female Urogenital Fistula; From Simple to the Complex Scenario
Workshop 11, Managing Chronic Radiation, Ketamine & Eosinophillic Cystitis; Update from the ERN eUrogen Guideline Committee
Workshop 12, Combating Recurrent UTIs: Latest Developments in Embedded Infections and UTI Vaccines
Workshop 13, Hands-on Workshop on Transanal Irrigation (TAI) in the Management of Anorectal Dysfunction
Workshop 14, ICS CORE CURRICCULUM (FREE) Research Ethics for the Non-Expert
Workshop 15, Hands-on Sacral Neuromodulation Training with World Leading Experts #1
Workshop 16, Management of Bowel Disorders Associated with Combined Pelvic Organ and Rectal Prolapse. A combined ICS and ASCRS Workshop
Workshop 17, Neuro-Urology in Action: Real Cases, Real Solutions. An interactive session from the ICS Neuro-Urology Promotion Committee
Workshop 18, Hands-on Sacral Neuromodulation Training with World Leading Experts #2
Workshop 19, EUS Workshop #1: Advanced Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Management – Techniques, Tools, and Troubleshooting
Workshop 20, Management of Complications of Pelvic Floor and Incontinence Surgery - Demonstration through Surgical Video Cases
Workshop 21, Continence Across the Continents: Female Stress Incontinence Surgery Comprehensive Masterclass
Workshop 22, Autonomic Dysreflexia (AD): a Serious, Rather Underestimated Condition
Workshop 23, EUS Workshop #2: CCAD Men’s Health: Hands-On Workshop and Semi-Live Surgical Training
Workshop 24, EUS Workshop #3: Endourological Masterclass for Stone disease (PCNL, FURS, ECIRS)
Workshop 25, Incontinence in Long-term Care: a Pervasive & Insidious Problem
Workshop 26, IUGA WORKSHOP - The Who, When, Why and How of Colpocleisis
Workshop 27, Beyond the Headlines: Mastering the Art of Interpreting Intervention Trial Results Without Being Misled
Workshop 28, EUS Workshop #4: Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate (AEEP)
Workshop 29, Clean Intermittent Catheterization in Children and Adult — from Basic to Clinical Application
*
2.
Please note how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements
(Required.)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The speakers were engaging and experts in the field
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The length and pace of the workshop was good and allowed plenty time for discussion and questions
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The handouts were easy to download and beneficial to my learning
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The research presented had good scientific merit and showed high-quality findings
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The audio and visual aids used were of high-quality and appropriate for the session
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This workshop was appropriately multi-disciplinary
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
This workshop was appropriately multi-national
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
If you answered 'Disagree' or 'Strongly Disagree' to any of the above, please expand on your answer.
*
3.
Please rate the following qualities of the workshop?
(Required.)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Originality
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Relevance
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Innovation
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
If you answered 'Fair' or 'Poor' to any of the above, please expand on your answer.
*
4.
Were the objectives of this workshop met?
(Required.)
Yes
No
If 'No', please expand.
*
5.
What were your main take aways from this workshop?
(Required.)
6.
Please note any improvement suggestions for this workshop here.
