Exit this survey Emergency Grand Rounds - May 3/16 - A Chochinov, R Nepomuceno 1. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GR_May_3_16 Question Title * 1. 12:30 Dr. Alecs Chochinov (Emergency Physician, SBGH; Head, Department of Emergency Medicine) ED Flow: State of the Union Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 2. Comments Question Title * 3. 13:30 Dr. Roman Nepomuceno (FRCP-EM Resident) ECMO CPR: Updates and Local Perspectives Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Was consistent with objectives Was consistent with objectives Strongly Disagree Was consistent with objectives Disagree Was consistent with objectives Neutral Was consistent with objectives Agree Was consistent with objectives Strongly Agree Info was presented clearly Info was presented clearly Strongly Disagree Info was presented clearly Disagree Info was presented clearly Neutral Info was presented clearly Agree Info was presented clearly Strongly Agree Info was relevant to practice Info was relevant to practice Strongly Disagree Info was relevant to practice Disagree Info was relevant to practice Neutral Info was relevant to practice Agree Info was relevant to practice Strongly Agree Discussion time was adequate Discussion time was adequate Strongly Disagree Discussion time was adequate Disagree Discussion time was adequate Neutral Discussion time was adequate Agree Discussion time was adequate Strongly Agree Question Title * 4. Comments Question Title * 5. How did you attend Rounds? In person at ST B via Telehealth Live on web After on archives Question Title * 6. Name and Location (optional for live viewers, but required for Telehealth viewers)*** Learning credits can only be earned if viewing in person at the University of Manitoba or on MB Telehealth Done
