Georgia Cancer Center Bioinformatics Satisfaction Survey
1.
How often have you or your lab used this Shared Resource in the last year
0-2
3-5
5 or more
2.
Which Services or Equipment did you use for your experiments?
Computational Analysis Hourly rate
*fastq only
6-12 samples with fastq QC report
QC report (fastq & bam alignment)
Tables (fold changes & p-values, 1~3 comparisons)
Whole genome comparisons (volcano, PCA, MA & clustering)
Pathway analysis (universal std., heatmaps, GO & IPA, 2 groups)
Pathway analysis (gene candidates, heatmaps, GO & IPA, 2~3 groups)
lncRNA tables (fold changes & p-values; 1~3 comparisons)
mRNA & lncRNA association
Splicing isoform Analysis (6 samples; 3 vs 3 comparisons)
Fusion gene (6 samples; 3 vs 3 somatic comparisons)
ChIP-seq:Tables (Enriched Peak fold changes & p-values, 1~3 comparisons)
Whole genome analysis (1~3 somatic comparisons)
Pathway analysis (universal std., heatmaps, GO & IPA, 2 groups)
Pathway analysis (gene candidates, heatmaps, GO & IPA, 2~3 groups)
miRNA: Table (detections with 12 individual normalized counts)
mRNA & miRNA association
DNA-Seq: Tables (6 germline or 3 vs 3 somatic mutation detections with VEP annotations
Copy Number CNV (12 germline, 6 somatic CNVs)
Methyl-Seq: Tables (3 vs 3 somatic differentially methylated regions)
Single cell RNA analysis: Cell ranger & Loupe cell browser with fastq and analytic matrics transfer
Single cell RNA analysis: Per aggregation
Single cell RNA analysis: Seurat V3
Integration of two datasets: Pathway analysis (universal std., heatmaps, GO & IPA, 2 groups)
Integration of two datasets: Pathway analysis (gene candidates, heatmaps, GO & IPA, 2~3 groups)
IPA (user access)
GEO Deposit
Extra analyses
Do not know the exact service-- Please provide for me
Other (please specify)
3.
How would you rate the quality of the service?
Very high quality
High quality
Neither high nor low quality
Low quality
Very low quality
4.
Were you satisfied with the quality and presentation of the data?
not at all satisfied
1 star
somewhat satisfied
2 stars
satisfied
3 stars
very satisfied
4 stars
extremely satisfied
5 stars
Other (please specify)
5.
How would you rate your interaction with the GCC Bioinformatics Shared Resource personnel
Very unprofessional, communicaton skills were not adequate
1 star
Somewhat professional, need to work on communication skills
2 stars
Service and communication were adequate
3 stars
Service and communication were very good
4 stars
Service and communication were excellent
5 stars
6.
Would you recommend this Shared Resource to other researchers
Yes
No
7.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the GCC Bioinformatics Shared Resource
Current Progress,
0 of 7 answered