2017 NY WOUND CARE SYMPOSIUM Question Title * 1. What is your name? Please indicate LAST NAME FIRST. Question Title * 2. Please rate Dr Prakash Krishnan- Diagnosis and Treatment for PADRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 3. Please rate Dr Allen Jacobs- Documentation Issues in the Evaluation of the DiabeticRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 4. Please rate Dr Mark Kosinski- Reading a C&S Report. What you should look for? 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 5. Please rate Dr Michael Trepal- Osteomyelitis- Medical and Surgical ManagementRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 6. Please rate Dr Pradeep Albert- Xray, MRI and Bone Biopsy- When to do what?Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 7. Please rate Dr Allen Jacobs- Nutritional Requirements in Ulceration ManagementRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 8. Please rate Dr Rajiv Chandler- Interventional Approach vs Distal BypassRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 9. Please rate Dr Jeff Cusack- Delivering a ONE-TWO punch to DFURate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 10. Please rate Dr Matrona Giakoumis- Biomechanics and Surgical Approaches to the Diabetic Ulcerative FootRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 11. Please rate Dr Sammy Adegboyega- Surgical Approaches to AmputationRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 12. Please rate Dr David Gitlin- Internal v External Fixation in the Diabetic FootRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 13. Please rate Dr Allan Freedline- The Economic Impact of Wound Care in our SocietyRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation was easy to follow Presentation was easy to follow 1 Presentation was easy to follow 2 Presentation was easy to follow 3 Presentation was easy to follow 4 Presentation was easy to follow 5 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4 Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5 Lecturer sought audience feedback Lecturer sought audience feedback 1 Lecturer sought audience feedback 2 Lecturer sought audience feedback 3 Lecturer sought audience feedback 4 Lecturer sought audience feedback 5 Question Title * 14. EMERGING TOPICS IN WOUND CARERate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5 Hands-on participation was effective Hands-on participation was effective 1 Hands-on participation was effective 2 Hands-on participation was effective 3 Hands-on participation was effective 4 Hands-on participation was effective 5 Question Title * 15. Topical Oxygen WORKSHOPRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5 Hands-on participation was effective Hands-on participation was effective 1 Hands-on participation was effective 2 Hands-on participation was effective 3 Hands-on participation was effective 4 Hands-on participation was effective 5 Question Title * 16. PLASTIC SURGERY TECHNIQUE WORKSHOPRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5 Hands-on participation was effective Hands-on participation was effective 1 Hands-on participation was effective 2 Hands-on participation was effective 3 Hands-on participation was effective 4 Hands-on participation was effective 5 Question Title * 17. Vascular Diagnosis and and Treatment for CLI WORKSHOPRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5 Hands-on participation was effective Hands-on participation was effective 1 Hands-on participation was effective 2 Hands-on participation was effective 3 Hands-on participation was effective 4 Hands-on participation was effective 5 Question Title * 18. Total Contact Cast WORKSHOPRate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 Evidence-Based Content Evidence-Based Content 1 Evidence-Based Content 2 Evidence-Based Content 3 Evidence-Based Content 4 Evidence-Based Content 5 Relevant Relevant 1 Relevant 2 Relevant 3 Relevant 4 Relevant 5 Presentation format was clear Presentation format was clear 1 Presentation format was clear 2 Presentation format was clear 3 Presentation format was clear 4 Presentation format was clear 5 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4 Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5 Hands-on participation was effective Hands-on participation was effective 1 Hands-on participation was effective 2 Hands-on participation was effective 3 Hands-on participation was effective 4 Hands-on participation was effective 5 Question Title * 19. Please rate THE OVERALL PROGRAM IN TERMS OF.........Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 1 RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 2 RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 3 RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 4 RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 5 POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 1 POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 2 POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 3 POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 4 POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 5 INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 1 INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 2 INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 3 INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 4 INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 5 Question Title * 20. Please rate THE PROGRAM VENUE IN TERMS OF.......Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest. 1 2 3 4 5 COMFORT COMFORT 1 COMFORT 2 COMFORT 3 COMFORT 4 COMFORT 5 AUDIO/VISUAL AUDIO/VISUAL 1 AUDIO/VISUAL 2 AUDIO/VISUAL 3 AUDIO/VISUAL 4 AUDIO/VISUAL 5 HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 1 HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 2 HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 3 HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 4 HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 5 Question Title * 21. PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO ADD ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS YOU HAVE, SUGGESTIONS FOR CONTENT OF EITHER A 2018 WOUND CARE PROGRAM, OR ANY OTHER CE CONTENT YOU WOULD WANT TO SEE. Done