2017 NY WOUND CARE SYMPOSIUM

Question Title

* 1. What is your name? Please indicate LAST NAME FIRST.

Question Title

* 2. Please rate Dr Prakash Krishnan- Diagnosis and Treatment for PAD
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 3. Please rate Dr Allen Jacobs- Documentation Issues in the Evaluation of the Diabetic
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 4. Please rate Dr Mark Kosinski- Reading a C&S Report. What you should look for?

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 5. Please rate Dr Michael Trepal- Osteomyelitis- Medical and Surgical Management
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 6. Please rate Dr Pradeep Albert- Xray, MRI and Bone Biopsy- When to do what?
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 7. Please rate Dr Allen Jacobs- Nutritional Requirements in Ulceration Management
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 8. Please rate Dr Rajiv Chandler- Interventional Approach vs Distal Bypass
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 9. Please rate Dr Jeff Cusack- Delivering a ONE-TWO punch to DFU
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 10. Please rate Dr Matrona Giakoumis- Biomechanics and Surgical Approaches to the Diabetic Ulcerative Foot
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 11. Please rate Dr Sammy Adegboyega- Surgical Approaches to Amputation
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 12. Please rate Dr David Gitlin- Internal v External Fixation in the Diabetic Foot
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 13. Please rate Dr Allan Freedline- The Economic Impact of Wound Care in our Society

Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation was easy to follow	Presentation was easy to follow 1	Presentation was easy to follow 2	Presentation was easy to follow 3	Presentation was easy to follow 4	Presentation was easy to follow 5
Lecturer communicated goals for lecture	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 1	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 2	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 3	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 4	Lecturer communicated goals for lecture 5
Lecturer sought audience feedback	Lecturer sought audience feedback 1	Lecturer sought audience feedback 2	Lecturer sought audience feedback 3	Lecturer sought audience feedback 4	Lecturer sought audience feedback 5

Question Title

* 14. EMERGING TOPICS IN WOUND CARE
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5
Hands-on participation was effective	Hands-on participation was effective 1	Hands-on participation was effective 2	Hands-on participation was effective 3	Hands-on participation was effective 4	Hands-on participation was effective 5

Question Title

* 15. Topical Oxygen WORKSHOP
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5
Hands-on participation was effective	Hands-on participation was effective 1	Hands-on participation was effective 2	Hands-on participation was effective 3	Hands-on participation was effective 4	Hands-on participation was effective 5

Question Title

* 16. PLASTIC SURGERY TECHNIQUE WORKSHOP
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5
Hands-on participation was effective	Hands-on participation was effective 1	Hands-on participation was effective 2	Hands-on participation was effective 3	Hands-on participation was effective 4	Hands-on participation was effective 5

Question Title

* 17. Vascular Diagnosis and and Treatment for CLI WORKSHOP
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5
Hands-on participation was effective	Hands-on participation was effective 1	Hands-on participation was effective 2	Hands-on participation was effective 3	Hands-on participation was effective 4	Hands-on participation was effective 5

Question Title

* 18. Total Contact Cast WORKSHOP
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
Evidence-Based Content	Evidence-Based Content 1	Evidence-Based Content 2	Evidence-Based Content 3	Evidence-Based Content 4	Evidence-Based Content 5
Relevant	Relevant 1	Relevant 2	Relevant 3	Relevant 4	Relevant 5
Presentation format was clear	Presentation format was clear 1	Presentation format was clear 2	Presentation format was clear 3	Presentation format was clear 4	Presentation format was clear 5
Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 1	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 2	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 3	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 4	Presentation / Interaction was easy to follow 5
Hands-on participation was effective	Hands-on participation was effective 1	Hands-on participation was effective 2	Hands-on participation was effective 3	Hands-on participation was effective 4	Hands-on participation was effective 5

Question Title

* 19. Please rate THE OVERALL PROGRAM IN TERMS OF.........
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS	RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 1	RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 2	RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 3	RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 4	RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE NEEDS 5
POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS	POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 1	POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 2	POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 3	POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 4	POTENTIAL TO CHANGE PRACTICE HABITS 5
INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE	INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 1	INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 2	INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 3	INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 4	INDEPENDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL INFLUENCE 5

Question Title

* 20. Please rate THE PROGRAM VENUE IN TERMS OF.......
Rate 1 as Lowest Rating, 5 as highest.

	1	2	3	4	5
COMFORT	COMFORT 1	COMFORT 2	COMFORT 3	COMFORT 4	COMFORT 5
AUDIO/VISUAL	AUDIO/VISUAL 1	AUDIO/VISUAL 2	AUDIO/VISUAL 3	AUDIO/VISUAL 4	AUDIO/VISUAL 5
HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED.	HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 1	HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 2	HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 3	HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 4	HANDOUTS/REFERENCE MATERIAL- IF OFFERED. 5

Question Title

* 21. PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO ADD ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS YOU HAVE, SUGGESTIONS FOR CONTENT OF EITHER A 2018 WOUND CARE PROGRAM, OR ANY OTHER CE CONTENT YOU WOULD WANT TO SEE.