Interdisciplinary Aortic Dissection Symposium 2026

1.The meeting was relevant to my educational needs
2.The meeting was well structured
3.The speakers communicated effectively
4.The information was well presented
5.The meeting avoided all undue bias
6.There was sufficient time available for discussion
7.The meeting will influence my practice
8.The meeting provided good networking opportunities
9.Please help us understand why you selected any of the answers above
10.We would be grateful to receive your views on the individual sessions at the meeting which are listed below
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
N/A
The Role of the Interdisciplinary "Aortic Team" in Optimising the Emergency Transfer of Patients and its Impact on Outcome: Marcus Brooks
Imaging Surveillance After Type B Dissection: How Often, What to Look For, and What We May Be Missing: Federica Catapano
Contemporary analysis techniques for multimodal data and how it can inform the management of type B aortic dissection: Kak Khee Yeung
Guidelines vs Reality: Where Evidence Fails in Type B Aortic Dissection: Anders Wanhainen
Perspectives on survivorship and surveillance: Martin Hilton &
The Harold Ellis Distinguished Lecture:
Endovascular Reconstruction of the Dissected Ascending Aorta and Arch: Defining Strategy in the Era of Fenestrated and Branched Repair and What Comes Next: Stephan Haulon
From open to hybrid to total endovascular: Navigating the transition in the treatment of the dissected aortic arch: Nimesh Desai
Do we need a more effective solution for chronic false lumen sac management?: Gustavo Oderich
Strategy & Future Scoping Roundtable
1. Remote Monitoring in Aortic Dissection
2. Is remodelling for chronic dissection important and if so how can we achieve it?
3. Functional and haemodynamic assessment of the dissected aorta, with potential AI integration
4. Endovascular technologies in connective tissue disease
INTEGRATED AORTIC TEAM DEBATE:
One Aorta. Four Experts. One Decision?
Cook Medical Guest Lecture: Patient-specific solutiosn for complicated Type B dissection: Tara Mastracci
Off-the-shelf endovascular solutions will replace custom and physician-modified devices in aortic dissection: Tim Resch vs Gustavo Oderich
Malperfusion in Type A Aortic Dissection: When, How and What to Fix First: Eric Roselli
The Hostile Access: Navigating True Lumen Collapse, Iliac Malperfusion, and the Inaccessible Branch Vessel: Barend Mees
Complications of TEVAR in Dissection: Risk factors, Prevention, Recognition and Bailout Strategies: Stephen Cheng
INTERACTIVE MDT SIMULATION: Becky Sandford & Mohamed Abdelhalim
Gore Guest Lecture: Optimising Aortic Arch Treatment: Clinical Experience with the GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis: David Murray
Global roundtable on evidence for managing uncomplicated type B dissection:
1. Medical optimisation, how is this being achieved in practice in the trials?
2. Does device choice and timing of intervention really change outcomes?
3. What are we learning from the patients not included in the trials? Data from screening
4. How generalisable are these trials – Management of dissections and centres of expertise
IMH is not a separate disease, it should be treated the same as dissection: Firas Mussa vs Jacob Budtz-Lilly
When Treatment Creates the Next Problem: Kak Khee Yeung & Anders Wanhainen
1. Distal stent-induced new entry (dSINE)
2. Extensive aortic coverage and altering stiffness
The STABILISE registry: What have we learnt?: Germano Melissano
Trends in epidemiology and outcome of aortic dissections – a national population-based study: Kevin Mani
11.As a result of attending this course, I have improved my knowledge of:
The latest evidence pertaining to treatment of acute and chronic dissection
The nuances of optimal patient selection and intervention
Choosing the various endovascular techniques for treating chronic type B dissection
Approaches for the treatment of difficult cases
The results of highly anticipated research into treatment of aortic dissection
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
12.What is the most important thing you have learnt from this event?
13.How did you hear about the meeting?
14.Please let us know any further comments you may have on the meeting