MICRO 2016 1. Survey of Micro-49 Attendees. All answers anonymous. Question Title * 1. What was your overall impression of MICRO? Excellent Good Fair Poor Specific comments Question Title * 2. What was your impression of the MICRO Workshops and Tutorials? Excellent Good Fair Poor Not Applicable Specific comments Question Title * 3. What was your impression of the poster session? Excellent Good Fair Poor Specific comments Question Title * 4. What most closely reflects your preference in terms of papers selected and program style? Current approach: about 60 papers accepted and dual track for most time slots Single track and accept fewer papers Single track and spread Micro over more days Even more tracks and more papers, but same time period Even more tracks and fewer days Other (Please specify) Specific comments Question Title * 5. What was your impression of the Howard Hotel for conference activities? Excellent Good Fair Poor Specific comments Question Title * 6. What was your impression of the excursion to the Shung Ye Museum and the National Palace Museum? Excellent Good Fair Poor Specific comments Question Title * 7. What was your view of Taipei as a venue for Micro? Excellent Good Fair Poor Specific comments Question Title * 8. How do you view Micro's new October timeslot vs recent history of Micro in December? Strongly prefer new October slot Prefer new October slot Neutral Prefer old December slot Strongly prefer old December slot Specific comments Question Title * 9. How would you view Micro sharing a joint venue with other conferences such as PACT? Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Specific comments Question Title * 10. Please provide any other comments Done