While we like to have fun here at IJNR, we also take our mission very seriously. Because of this, we like to enlist our alumni to help make sure that our programs are the very best they can be. If there was a portion of this workshop that you either really loved or found to be a waste of time, please tell us! Your thoughtful feedback will help ensure that IJNR's programming continues to be relevant and useful to journalists. Oh, and our funders require this kind of reporting - so it's pretty darn important. Thank you for your time and effort!

Question Title

* 1. Please rate each portion of the Wildfire Policy, Politics & Science Workshop:

  A = Excellent B = Very Good C = Decent D = Lousy F = Terrible
Moment of Ignition: Fire Management in the U.S. is Poised for Change - But What Will It Look Like, and Will It Be Enough?
Bringing Fire Home: Getting Good Fire Back on the Land and Back to the People
Risky Business: Wildfire and Insurance in an Increasingly Flammable Landscape
Building Resilience: Community Adaptation, Partnerships, and Workforce
Burning Needs: Wildland Firefighter Well-being and the Future of the Industry
The New Normal? Making Sense of Recent Wildfire Seasons and What the Future May Hold

Question Title

* 2. Don't worry! We're not making you rate them all, but please read through the list of speakers and, if a name stands out, let us know! If you found any of these speakers to be particularly outstanding (engaging, helpful, information-laden, etc.) or particularly unimpressive (unhelpful, boring, uninformed), please share your thoughts so we know who to invite to speak to journalists again in the future.

Question Title

* 3. Please pretend you're Goldilocks, and rate the content, pace, and delivery of the workshop, on a "too much," "not enough," and "just right" scale.

  Too Much Just Right Not Enough
Content
Breaks
Q&A

Question Title

* 4. If you said "too much" content, what would recommend cutting? Or, if you said "not enough" content, what would you recommend adding?

Question Title

* 5. Was the amount of time devoted to each topic sufficient?

Question Title

* 6. How did the workshop measure up to your expectations?

Question Title

* 7. Were there voices missing from the conversation?

Question Title

* 8. Would you consider attending another virtual IJNR workshop?

Question Title

* 9. Would you consider attending a two-day in-person IJNR workshop in the future?

Question Title

* 10. Would you consider attending a week-long IJNR institute in the future?

Question Title

* 11. Would you recommend an IJNR workshop to a friend or colleague?

Question Title

* 12. Do you feel more confident or better prepared to cover stories about wildfire, having attended the workshop?

Question Title

* 13. Do you feel that you gained a number of valuable story ideas over the course of the workshop?

Question Title

* 14. If so, how may stories do you hope to produce, based on the workshop, within the next 6 months?

Question Title

* 15. On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being not at all interested, and 5 being very interested), how interested are you in covering each of the various workshop topics?

  1 2 3 4 5
Federal fire policy
Collaborative fire management
Prescribed fire
Cultural fire
Insurance and wildfire
Community wildfire adaptation
Wildland firefighter wellbeing and challenges
Climate and/or drought and fire
Smoke and public health

Question Title

* 16. Please give the workshop an overall grade:

Question Title

* 17. Finally, journalist testimonials can be valuable feedback for our staff, as well as powerful promotional tools for our funders. If you'd like to leave a few last thoughts on the program, we'd appreciate it.

Question Title

* 18. Name (if you'd rather leave your answers anonymous, just type "anonymous" or some other fancy pseudonym. HOWEVER, if you have anything good to say about us, our funders will only believe us if we can attribute the quote to someone, so we leave this option just in case!)

T