Use of Auto-Verification in Clinical Laboratories Auto-Verification Survey Question Title * 1. Type of laboratory? University Hospital Lab Community/Regional Hospital Lab Reference Lab Clinic (Any Type) Research Lab Speciality Lab Other (please specify) Question Title * 2. Do you use auto-verification in your Lab? Yes No Planning to implement within the next 12 month Other (please specify) Question Title * 3. What barriers did you experience in implementing auto-verification Technical complexity Insufficient time/resources Resistance from staff Lack of vendor support Other competing projects Other (please specify) Question Title * 4. What discipline do you use for the Auto-verification of results? Chemistry/Immuno Chem Molecular Hematology Urinalysis Coagulation Microbiology Other Question Title * 5. Do you plan to expand auto-verification to other test areas in the next 12 months? Yes No Unsure Other (please specify) Question Title * 6. What percentage of your lab’s test volume is currently auto-verified? 0% 1-50 51-100 Clear i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale. Question Title * 7. What is your overall auto-verification rate across disciplines? >90% 75-90% 50-75% <50% Other (please specify) Question Title * 8. How were your auto-verification rules developed? Vendor-supplied/default rules Customized internally by lab staff Developed with consultant/vendor support Based on peer-reviewed guidelines Other (please specify) Question Title * 9. What are the main benefits your lab has experienced? Faster/improved TAT Improved quality of results/less errors Less manual reivew Increased lab productivity Standard decision making Improved staff satisfaction/retention Other (please specify) Page1 / 1 100% of survey complete. Done