JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EMOTION FTCOR PROCESS FEEDBACK (REVIEWER)

Thank you for participating as a reviewer in the Journal of Philosophy of Emotion's (JPE's) pilot testing phase of its fully transparent, cooperative, open review (FTCOR) process. The JPE appreciates your willingness to provide us with the feedback necessary for evaluating the FTCOR process to help us determine whether or not we will maintain this review process in the future. Please note that the results of this survey, along with any comments, may be shared on the JPE website, with members of the Society for Philosophy of Emotion, or with other academic partners.

Question Title

* 1. Please tell us how easy you found the FTCOR process to use as a reviewer.

0 (Very easy) 5 (Like all other review processes) 10 (Very difficult)
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 2. Please tell us how time consuming the FTCOR process was for you as a reviewer.

0 (Not time consuming) 5 (Like all other review processes) 10 (Very time consuming)
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 3. Please tell us how productive/helpful you found the FTCOR process as a reviewer.

0 (Not productive/helpful) 5 (Like all other review processes) 10 (Very productive/helpful)
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 4. Please tell us how frustrating or annoying you found the FTCOR process as a reviewer.

0 (Not frustrating/annoying) 5 (Like all other review processes) 10 (Very frustrating/annoying)
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 5. Please tell us how, as a reviewer, you found the quality of the review that was provided through the FTCOR process.

0 (No very good) 5 (Like all other review processes) 10 (Very good)
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 6. Please tell us, as a reviewer, how much you think the FTCOR process may have contributed to increasing the quality of the manuscript you reviewed prior to its submission.

0 (May not have made a significant contribution) 5 (Like all other review processes) 10 (May have made a very significant contribution)
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 7. Please tell us how productive/helpful you think the FTCOR process was for the author of the manuscript you reviewed.

0 (Not at all helpful) 0 (Like all other review processes) 10 (Very helpful)
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 8. Please tell us how productive/helpful you think the FTCOR process was for the associate editor of the manuscript you reviewed.

0 (Not very productive/helpful) 5 (Like all other review processes) 10 (Very productive/helpful)
Clear
i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

* 9. Please tell us if you think the JPE should continue to use the FTCOR process.

Question Title

* 10. Please use the space provided to give us any comments, suggestions, feedback regarding the FTCOR process that was not addressed in the previous questions. 

T