Western Juvenile Defender Center Leadship Summit
June 6-7, 2019 - University of Montana Law School

Conference Evaluation

Please rate the sessions that you attended:

Question Title

1. On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = worst, 5 = best), how would you rate "Reasonable Child Standard and JDB?"

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

2. Why?

Question Title

3. On a scale of 1 to 5, how would you rate the presentation, "Motion Practice JTIP Module #18?" (You'll rate the forensic exercise in the next question.)

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

4. How would you rate the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

5. Why did you give those responses in questions 3 and 4?

Question Title

6. How would you rate the presentation, "Preserving the Record and Appellate Advocacy - JTIP Module #35?"

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

7. And the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

8. Why did you give those responses in questions 6 and 7?

Question Title

9. How would you rate "Defenders as Catalysts in Juvenile Justice Policy Reform?"

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Question Title

10. And the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Clear

i We adjusted the number you entered based on the slider’s scale.

Western Juvenile Defender Center Leadship Summit
June 6-7, 2019 - University of Montana Law School

Conference Evaluation

Question Title

1. On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = worst, 5 = best), how would you rate "Reasonable Child Standard and JDB?"

Question Title

2. Why?

Question Title

3. On a scale of 1 to 5, how would you rate the presentation, "Motion Practice JTIP Module #18?" (You'll rate the forensic exercise in the next question.)

Question Title

4. How would you rate the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Question Title

5. Why did you give those responses in questions 3 and 4?

Question Title

6. How would you rate the presentation, "Preserving the Record and Appellate Advocacy - JTIP Module #35?"

Question Title

7. And the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Question Title

8. Why did you give those responses in questions 6 and 7?

Question Title

9. How would you rate "Defenders as Catalysts in Juvenile Justice Policy Reform?"

Question Title

10. And the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Question Title

11. How do you anticipate integrating information from today's training into your work?

Question Title

12. What topics would you like to see covered in future Summits?

Western Juvenile Defender Center Leadship SummitJune 6-7, 2019 - University of Montana Law School

Conference Evaluation

Question Title

* 1. On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = worst, 5 = best), how would you rate "Reasonable Child Standard and JDB?"

Question Title

* 2. Why?

Question Title

* 3. On a scale of 1 to 5, how would you rate the presentation, "Motion Practice JTIP Module #18?" (You'll rate the forensic exercise in the next question.)

Question Title

* 4. How would you rate the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Question Title

* 5. Why did you give those responses in questions 3 and 4?

Question Title

* 6. How would you rate the presentation, "Preserving the Record and Appellate Advocacy - JTIP Module #35?"

Question Title

* 7. And the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Question Title

* 8. Why did you give those responses in questions 6 and 7?

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate "Defenders as Catalysts in Juvenile Justice Policy Reform?"

Question Title

* 10. And the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

Question Title

* 11. How do you anticipate integrating information from today's training into your work?

Question Title

* 12. What topics would you like to see covered in future Summits?

Western Juvenile Defender Center Leadship Summit
June 6-7, 2019 - University of Montana Law School

1. On a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = worst, 5 = best), how would you rate "Reasonable Child Standard and JDB?"

2. Why?

3. On a scale of 1 to 5, how would you rate the presentation, "Motion Practice JTIP Module #18?" (You'll rate the forensic exercise in the next question.)

4. How would you rate the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

5. Why did you give those responses in questions 3 and 4?

6. How would you rate the presentation, "Preserving the Record and Appellate Advocacy - JTIP Module #35?"

7. And the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

8. Why did you give those responses in questions 6 and 7?

9. How would you rate "Defenders as Catalysts in Juvenile Justice Policy Reform?"

10. And the accompanying Forensic Exercise?

11. How do you anticipate integrating information from today's training into your work?

12. What topics would you like to see covered in future Summits?