Skip to content
Evaluation CAPES Module #1: Juvenile Spondyloarthritis (JSpA) and Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis (JPsA)
Demographic Questions
1.
Please provide your name and email address.
Name
Email Address
2.
What is your specialty?
Dermatology
Rheumatology
Primary Care
Other (please specify)
3.
Please indicate your practice setting.
Academic
Community
4.
Number of patients seen/impacted per week.
Activity Objectives: Please rate your level of achievement.
5.
Recognize a patient who may be presenting with a form of juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA).
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
6.
Describe the main clinical features of JSpA.
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
7.
Understand the current classification of JSpA.
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
8.
Recognize that this is an evolving area of pediatric rheumatology.
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
9.
To learn the age-related changes that make axial disease imaging challenging in youth.
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
10.
To learn mimics of axial inflammation in youth.
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
11.
To be familiar with treatment options for children with spondyloarthritis.
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
12.
To recognize long-term outcome of children with spondyloarthritis in comparison with children with other categories of JIA.
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
Evaluation of the Presenters
13.
The
content
of the presentation given by Aamena Hameed was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
14.
The
delivery
of the presentation given by Aamena Hameed was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
15.
Did Aamena Hameed appear
objective
and
unbiased
by commercial interests
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
16.
The
content
of the presentation given by Asad Khan was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
17.
The
delivery
of the presentation given by Asad Khan was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
18.
Did Asad Khan appear
objective
and
unbiased
by commercial interests
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
19.
The
content
of the presentation given by Wendy Olsder was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
20.
The
delivery
of the presentation given by Wendy Olsder was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
21.
Did Wendy Olsder appear
objective
and
unbiased
by commercial interests
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
22.
The
content
of the presentation given by Dax G. Rumsey, MD, MSc, FRCP(C), was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
23.
The
delivery
of the presentation given by Dax G. Rumsey, MD, MSc, FRCP(C), was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
24.
Did Dax G. Rumsey, MD, MSc, FRCP(C), appear
objective
and
unbiased
by commercial interests
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
25.
The
content
of the presentation given by Matthew Stoll, M.D., PhD, MSCS, FAAD, was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
26.
The
delivery
of the presentation given by Matthew Stoll, M.D., PhD, MSCS, FAAD, was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
27.
Did Matthew Stoll, M.D., PhD, MSCS, appear
objective
and
unbiased
by commercial interests
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
28.
The
content
of the presentation given by Pamela F. Weiss, MD, MSCE, was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
29.
The
delivery
of the presentation given by Pamela F. Weiss, MD, MSCE, was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
30.
Did Pamela F. Weiss, MD, MSCE, appear
objective
and
unbiased
by commercial interests
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
31.
As a moderator, Hema Srinivasalu, MD, was:
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
32.
Did Hema Srinivasalu, MD, appear
objective
and
unbiased
by commercial interests
Yes
No
If no, please explain:
Relevance and Application
33.
Was the information in this activity relevant to your practice or professional development?
Yes
No
34.
I learned new information about JSpA and JPsA as a result of this program.
Yes
No
35.
Based on the information you received today, do you plan on changing your practice?
Yes, I intend to change the therapy that I render
Yes, I intend to alter the way that I evaluate my patients
Yes, I intend to change the legal/documentation/financial management of my practice
Yes, it may affect my patient referrals
No, but it did confirm my current practice
No, because it doesn’t directly apply to my practice
No, but it did increase my knowledge of community resources
No, because the information was inadequate and/or inaccurate
Other (please elaborate)
36.
How would you rate the presentation overall?
Outstanding
Good
Average
Fair
Poor
37.
Please let us know about any other comments you have:
