Re: 23rd OAGS Annual Meeting, Saturday, November 11, 2017 - Evaluation of Speakers/Presentations
IF you DID NOT hand in a hard copy of the evaluation forms to the OAGS registration desk while attending the November meeting, please complete an online survey now.  (If you already handed it in, disregard this online request.)  Be sure to click the SUBMIT button at the bottom of the survey when completed (pressing the "Enter" on your keyboard does not submit the survey). Thank you.
(Deadline: November 30, 2017)

Please rate the quality of the activity on a scale of 1-5 (1 =poor...  5=excellent)

Question Title

* 1. Overall Program Evaluation

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall, how would you rate our program?
Overall, how would you rate the morning Session Chair Dr. Alice Wei?
Overall, how would you rate the afternoon Session Chair Dr. Kevin Lefebvre?
Overall, how would you rate the Business Meeting Session Chair Dr. Harshad Telang?

Question Title

* 2. Dr. Joseph DuBose- “International Lecture#1: Monitoring the ICU - The Current State of the Art”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 3. Dr. Claude Burul - “Debate: Hernia - Shouldice vs. Mesh Repair”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 4. Dr. Fred Brenneman- “Debate: Hernia - Shouldice vs. Mesh Repair”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 5. Dr. Neil Rau - “Antimicrobial Stewardship”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 6. Dr. Camilla Wong - “The Frail, Older Surgical Patient”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 7. Dr. Chris Vinden - “4 Pearls Panel: How I do it (Pilonidal)”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 8. Dr. Henry Chapeskie - “4 Pearls Panel: How I do it (Toe Nails)”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 9. Dr. Ralph George - “4 Pearls Panel: How I do it (Hidradenitis Suppurativa)”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 10. Dr. Shahriar Shahrokhi- “4 Pearls Panel: How I do it (Thermal Burns)”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 11. Dr. Nancy Down - “Debate: Breast Surgery - Seed vs. Wire Localization)”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 12. Dr. Jay Engel - “Debate: Breast Surgery - Seed vs. Wire Localization)”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 13. Dr. Catherine Dube - “Colonic Endoscopic Screening & Surveillance in the Above-Average-Risk Patient”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 14. Dr. Joseph DuBose - “International Lecture #2: Small Bowel Obstruction”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 15. Dr. Catherine Dube - “FIT:  What is it and what does it mean to General Surgery?”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 16. Dr. Shawn Whatley - “OMA Political Talk: Negotiations, Relativity, Incorporation and Public Disclosure of Physician Income”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 17. Dr. Kevin Lefebvre - “Billing Corner Interstitials”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 18. Business Meeting - “Chair, President, Section Chair, Treasurer, ResRep, etc.”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the Session
Presenters' Deliveries
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 19. Dr. Joseph DuBose- “Banquet Presentation: Shared Progress - Military and Civilian collaboration in advancing trauma care.”

  5 - Outstanding 4 - Above Average 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor
Overall rating of the presentation
Presenter’s Delivery
Fulfillment of Learning Objectives
Satisfaction of My Expectations
Avoidance of Commercial Bias
Applicability to My Practice 
Quality of audiovisual aids
Time Allotment for Presentation/Q&A

Question Title

* 20. Topic/Speaker Suggestions for next year: 2018

Question Title

* 21. Name/City (optional)

T