ASES 2022 Fellow's Symposium Friday, June 17th, 2022 Page1 / 3 33% of survey complete. Question Title * 1. Your overall impression of the ASES 2022 Fellow's Symposium was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 2. How would you rate Keynote Speaker #1: Robert H. Cofield MD? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Other (please specify) Question Title * 3. How would you rate the ASES Membership: Categories and Advancement session presented by Albert Lin, MD? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Other (please specify) Question Title * 4. How would you rate Keynote Speaker #2: Richard J. Hawkins, MD Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 5. How would you rate Symposium I: I'm Done with Fellowship, Now What? The Business of Starting A PracticeModerated by John W. Sperling, MD, MBA with a panel discussion including Michael H. Amini, MD, Grant E. Garrigues, MD, Jennifer Tangtiphaiboontana, MD, Thomas (Quin) W. Throckmorton, MD Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 6. How would you rate Symposium II: Shoulder Instability with Subcritical Bone Loss moderated by Justin Griffin, MD and presented with Emilie V. Cheung, MD, Brian R. Waterman, MD, Robert U. Hartzler, MD, Caroline M. Chebli, MD Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Podium Presentations Question Title * 7. Paper #1: Surgical treatment for the treatment of Instability following RSAThe overall quality of paper #1 presented by Craig Melbourne, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 8. Paper #2: Post-operative Gluccocorticoid use in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Early Results of a Randomized-Control TrialThe overall quality of paper #2 presented by William Runge, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 9. Paper #3: Development of Arm Injuries In Youth Baseball Players as they Mature: A 10-Year Prospective StudyThe overall quality of paper #3 presented by Nathan Boes, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 10. Paper #4: Remplissage Reduces Recurrent Instability in High-Risk Patients with “On-Track” Hill-Sachs LesionsThe overall quality of paper #4 presented by Aaron Eugene Barrow, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 11. Paper #5: Arthroscopic Bankart Repair with Remplissage Yields Similar or Better Functional Outcomes than Latarjet, with Higher Return to Sport, Fewer Complications, and Comparably Low Recurrence Rates at 2-Year Follow-UpThe overall quality of paper #5 presented by Jeffrey Leo Horinek, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 12. Paper #6: Arthroscopic Bankart Repair yields lower dislocation rates when performed in first time Dislocators compared to stabilization surgery after a Second Dislocation eventThe overall quality of paper #6 presented by Rafael Serrano, MD, was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 13. Paper #7: Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty in Walch C Glenoid Deformity: Mid-to-Long Term OutcomesThe overall quality of paper #7 presented by Adam Zaki Khan, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 14. Paper #8: Comparison of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Patients with Inflammatory ArthritisThe overall quality of paper #8 presented by Steve Lewis, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 15. Paper #9: Short-Term Outcomes of Patient-Specific Glenoid Vault Reconstruction System in Patients with Severe Glenoid Bone LossThe overall quality of paper #8 presented by Ravi Vaswani, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Question Title * 16. Paper #10: Minimum 10-year Clinical Follow-up of Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Glenohumeral ArthritisThe overall quality of paper #8 presented by Behnam Sharareh, MD was: Excellent Good Fair Poor Comments: Next