Skip to content
ASES 2022 Fellow's Symposium
Friday, June 17th, 2022
4 / 3
133%
1.
Your overall impression of the ASES 2022 Fellow's Symposium was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
2.
How would you rate Keynote Speaker #1: Robert H. Cofield MD?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Other (please specify)
3.
How would you rate the ASES Membership: Categories and Advancement session presented by Albert Lin, MD?
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Other (please specify)
4.
How would you rate Keynote Speaker #2: Richard J. Hawkins, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
5.
How would you rate Symposium I: I'm Done with Fellowship, Now What? The Business of Starting A Practice
Moderated by John W. Sperling, MD, MBA with a panel discussion including Michael H. Amini, MD, Grant E. Garrigues, MD, Jennifer Tangtiphaiboontana, MD, Thomas (Quin) W. Throckmorton, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
6.
How would you rate Symposium II: Shoulder Instability with Subcritical Bone Loss moderated by Justin Griffin, MD and presented with Emilie V. Cheung, MD, Brian R. Waterman, MD, Robert U. Hartzler, MD, Caroline M. Chebli, MD
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
Podium Presentations
7.
Paper #1: Surgical treatment for the treatment of Instability following RSA
The overall quality of paper #1 presented by Craig Melbourne, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
8.
Paper #2: Post-operative Gluccocorticoid use in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Early Results of a Randomized-Control Trial
The overall quality of paper #2 presented by William Runge, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
9.
Paper #3: Development of Arm Injuries In Youth Baseball Players as they Mature: A 10-Year Prospective Study
The overall quality of paper #3 presented by Nathan Boes, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
10.
Paper #4: Remplissage Reduces Recurrent Instability in High-Risk Patients with “On-Track” Hill-Sachs Lesions
The overall quality of paper #4 presented by Aaron Eugene Barrow, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
11.
Paper #5: Arthroscopic Bankart Repair with Remplissage Yields Similar or Better Functional Outcomes than Latarjet, with Higher Return to Sport, Fewer Complications, and Comparably Low Recurrence Rates at 2-Year Follow-Up
The overall quality of paper #5 presented by Jeffrey Leo Horinek, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
12.
Paper #6: Arthroscopic Bankart Repair yields lower dislocation rates when performed in first time Dislocators compared to stabilization surgery after a Second Dislocation event
The overall quality of paper #6 presented by Rafael Serrano, MD, was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
13.
Paper #7: Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty in Walch C Glenoid Deformity: Mid-to-Long Term Outcomes
The overall quality of paper #7 presented by Adam Zaki Khan, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
14.
Paper #8: Comparison of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis
The overall quality of paper #8 presented by Steve Lewis, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
15.
Paper #9: Short-Term Outcomes of Patient-Specific Glenoid Vault Reconstruction System in Patients with Severe Glenoid Bone Loss
The overall quality of paper #8 presented by Ravi Vaswani, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments:
16.
Paper #10: Minimum 10-year Clinical Follow-up of Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis
The overall quality of paper #8 presented by Behnam Sharareh, MD was:
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Comments: