Skip to content
San Mateo County Superior Court Multi-Option ADR Project ('MAP")

EVALUATION BY ATTORNEY
In accordance with Local Rule 3.905(c), please submit evaluations within 10 days of completion of the ADR process.

If your case did not settle, please note that effective 07/01/2021, Local Court Rule 3.905(b) requires parties to file a Statement of Nonagreement (ADR-CV-11) with the Court by the 90 ADR compliance deadline when the ADR session is unsuccessful in fully resolving the matter(s). This form facilitates setting cases for a Trial Setting Conference when ADR was unsuccessful in resolving the matter(s).

Statement of Nonagreement (ADR-CV-11) (ca.gov)

MAP staff and committees use this confidential information to assess the impact on the court, to track quality, to provide feedback to neutrals and to inform our decisions regarding redesign of program procedures. Other staff and trial judges do not see specific evaluations. This information will be aggregated for blind statistical reports to the Judicial Council, the Court and the community.
Case Number:(Required.)
Type of Case(Required.)
Case Name:(Required.)
Name of Neutral:(Required.)
Date of Session:(Required.)
I am:(Required.)
I participated in an ADR session(Required.)
If you answered NO above, please indicate the reason(s) why below.
Process(es) used in case (indicate all):
Please indicate if the case resolved:(Required.)
If the case resolved, how much of a factor was ADR in settlement of the case?
1- Not a factor
5 - Very Important
Totals
How many days elapsed (approximately between the filling of the complaint and the ADR session?
Indicate at what phase the ADR session occurred (indicate if more than one)
Which of the following court events were avoided because of the ADR session?
In your opinion, using ADR in this case:
In your opinion, using the ADR process in this case,
Please estimate the number of days court time was reduced/increased as a result of the parties going to ADR:
(Consider the decrease /increase in the number of court days relative to motions, settlement conferences and trial.)
Please indicate which, if any, of the following occurred during the ADR session: Please check all that apply.
On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being the lowest level and 5 being the highest level, please indicate your satisfaction by rating the following statements:
1 - Lowest
2
3
4
5 - Highest
This process was fair to all parties.
This process allowed all to be heard.
This process offered a safe secure setting.
My client did not feel unduly pressured by neutral to reach an agreement.
The neutral skillfully structured the process.
The neutral understood key issues.
I would use this neutral again.
I would use the MAP program again
We welcome any other comments or suggestions you may have regarding the ADR neutral used in this case or the Multi-Option ADR Project:
Privacy & Cookie Notice