Peripheral Neurostim What is the most important enabler to the broader adoption of minimally invasive Neurostim? Question Title * 1. Single-handed injection & deployment Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 2. Reduced subcutaneous tissue trauma (18 gauge catheter) Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 3. Fast simple and accurate procedure Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 4. Deep nerve target access Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 5. Consistent wireless power user experience Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 6. Flexibility for acute and chronic intended uses Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 7. Improved customer and technical support of minimally invasive neurostim suppliers (vs traditional battery neurostim suppliers) Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 8. Improved compliance features: (nerve impedance & electrode current) Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 9. Integrated IPG sensing biomarkers (Bioimpedance, Biopotential) HR, EMG, etc Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 10. Reduced probability of infection vs traditional battery neurostim Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 11. Reduced probability of hematoma or seroma vs traditional battery neurostim Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 12. Reduced probability of neurapraxia vs traditional battery neurostim Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 13. Reduced probability of migration & revision vs traditional battery neurostim Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 14. Multiple electrodes & advanced stim configurations Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Key Enabler Nice to have Not Important I don't know Question Title * 15. All of the above Yes - All of the above together will enable broader adoption No - additional features are required I don't know Yes - All of the above together will enable broader adoption No - additional features are required I don't know Question Title * 16. Other feature requirement 1 Question Title * 17. Other feature requirement 2 Question Title * 18. We need physician input to help build the next generation of minimally invasive neurostimulators. Please share your name so we can validate your clinical contribution. Next