Exit this survey AFCC Denver Symposium: Workshop 18—Evidence Reboot: From Traditional Custody Evaluation to Peacemaking Workshop 18—Evidence Reboot: From Traditional Custody Evaluation to Peacemaking Question Title * 1. W-18: "Evidence Reboot: From Traditional Custody Evaluation to Peacemaking" Based on the content of the institute, I am able to (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree): 1 2 3 4 5 1. Decide how a family court judge weighs traditional child custody evaluation evidence 1. Decide how a family court judge weighs traditional child custody evaluation evidence 1 1. Decide how a family court judge weighs traditional child custody evaluation evidence 2 1. Decide how a family court judge weighs traditional child custody evaluation evidence 3 1. Decide how a family court judge weighs traditional child custody evaluation evidence 4 1. Decide how a family court judge weighs traditional child custody evaluation evidence 5 2. Identify how peacemaking is given more weight by a judge than traditional evaluation 2. Identify how peacemaking is given more weight by a judge than traditional evaluation 1 2. Identify how peacemaking is given more weight by a judge than traditional evaluation 2 2. Identify how peacemaking is given more weight by a judge than traditional evaluation 3 2. Identify how peacemaking is given more weight by a judge than traditional evaluation 4 2. Identify how peacemaking is given more weight by a judge than traditional evaluation 5 3. Weigh usefulness of child custody evaluations when settlement appears unlikely 3. Weigh usefulness of child custody evaluations when settlement appears unlikely 1 3. Weigh usefulness of child custody evaluations when settlement appears unlikely 2 3. Weigh usefulness of child custody evaluations when settlement appears unlikely 3 3. Weigh usefulness of child custody evaluations when settlement appears unlikely 4 3. Weigh usefulness of child custody evaluations when settlement appears unlikely 5 Question Title * 2. Cynthia Bostwick, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 Level of knowledge and expertise Level of knowledge and expertise 1 Level of knowledge and expertise 2 Level of knowledge and expertise 3 Level of knowledge and expertise 4 Level of knowledge and expertise 5 Teaching ability Teaching ability 1 Teaching ability 2 Teaching ability 3 Teaching ability 4 Teaching ability 5 Maintained my interest Maintained my interest 1 Maintained my interest 2 Maintained my interest 3 Maintained my interest 4 Maintained my interest 5 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5 Question Title * 3. Hon. Timothy P. Connors (1=Poor, 5=Excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 Level of knowledge and expertise Level of knowledge and expertise 1 Level of knowledge and expertise 2 Level of knowledge and expertise 3 Level of knowledge and expertise 4 Level of knowledge and expertise 5 Teaching ability Teaching ability 1 Teaching ability 2 Teaching ability 3 Teaching ability 4 Teaching ability 5 Maintained my interest Maintained my interest 1 Maintained my interest 2 Maintained my interest 3 Maintained my interest 4 Maintained my interest 5 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5 Question Title * 4. Eugenia Patru, MSW (1=Poor, 5=Excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 Level of knowledge and expertise Level of knowledge and expertise 1 Level of knowledge and expertise 2 Level of knowledge and expertise 3 Level of knowledge and expertise 4 Level of knowledge and expertise 5 Teaching ability Teaching ability 1 Teaching ability 2 Teaching ability 3 Teaching ability 4 Teaching ability 5 Maintained my interest Maintained my interest 1 Maintained my interest 2 Maintained my interest 3 Maintained my interest 4 Maintained my interest 5 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5 Question Title * 5. Brett Shelton, JD (1=Poor, 5=Excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 Level of knowledge and expertise Level of knowledge and expertise 1 Level of knowledge and expertise 2 Level of knowledge and expertise 3 Level of knowledge and expertise 4 Level of knowledge and expertise 5 Teaching ability Teaching ability 1 Teaching ability 2 Teaching ability 3 Teaching ability 4 Teaching ability 5 Maintained my interest Maintained my interest 1 Maintained my interest 2 Maintained my interest 3 Maintained my interest 4 Maintained my interest 5 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 1 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 2 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 3 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 4 Was responsive to questions, comments and opinions 5 Question Title * 6. The content of the presentation was consistent with the abstract in the conference brochure Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Question Title * 7. Please rate this institute overall (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Question Title * 8. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? (1=Very little, 5=Great deal) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Question Title * 9. Information presented in this session reflected the most current evidence on this topic (1=Disagree, 5=Agree) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Question Title * 10. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development (1=Not useful, 5=Extremely useful) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Question Title * 11. Please provide any other comments that you think could help AFCC in making selection decisions about these presenters for future conferences: Next