Skip to content

DU-22 Symposium Evaluation Form

Your feedback provides us with vital information that assists in the development of future educational initiatives. 

Thank you for completing the evaluation form.
Assessment of Learning Objectives

Using a scale of poor to excellent, please indicate your level of confidence in each learning objective as it relates to your knowledge, belief, or behavior, pre-program and post-program.
Describe the concept of Time in Range and how it can be applied in clinical research
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Before
After
Utilize continuous glucose data to guide clinical decisions with patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Before
After
Discuss results of a recent clinical trial utilizing CGM data as the primary outcome and its relevance to clinical practice
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Before
After
Assessment of Presentations
Using a scale of poor to excellent, please rate the level of clarity and effectiveness of the information presented by the speakers.
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Dr. Bruce Perkins (Program Co-Chair)
Dr. Alice Y.Y. Cheng (Program Co-Chair)
Assessment of Educational Deliverables
What portion of the program was MOST valuable to you? Why?
From what you have learned, what will you be able to apply to your practice? What potential barriers do you anticipate and how will you overcome them?
Please indicate which topic(s) related to diabetes you would like to hear more about in the future:
Additional Feedback 
Using a scale of strongly disagree to strongly agree, please rate each statement as it relates to the program's content and delivery.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
The program met my educational expectations
The information provided will contribute to the care of my patients
This program allowed adequate time for interaction (min 25% of the session)
The subject was relevant to my practice
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated by all speakers
The program was well organized
The educational content of the program was balanced and free of commercial or other inappropriate bias.
Did this event adhere to CMA guidelines governing the relationship between physicians and industry?
Please indicate which CanMEDS role(s) you felt were addressed during this educational activity. Check all that apply:
Please share any additional comments:
Thank you!