Vote on the Code 2020 - Post-Conference Survey Question Title * 1. Is this your first time attending CMAHC’s triennial Vote on the Code conference? Yes No Question Title * 2. Overall, Vote on the Code 2020 was structured well – a productive agenda spread out over a three-day period. Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree Question Title * 3. How helpful were the Change Request (CR) presentations throughout the conference? Extremely helpful Very helpful Somewhat helpful Not so helpful Not at all helpful Question Title * 4. Did you use/refer to the CR Guidebook (hard copy and/or electronic) throughout the conference? Yes No What's the CR Guidebook? Question Title * 5. Which version of the CR Guidebook did you prefer/use more? Hard copy / printed version Electronic version I used both equally I don't know Question Title * 6. Which event format do you prefer for future Vote on the Code conferences? In-person event Virtual event In-person event with a virtual option No preference Question Title * 7. How likely is it that you would recommend future Vote on the Code conferences to colleagues in the aquatics, public health, academia or environmental health industries? Definitely would Probably would Probably would not Definitely would not Question Title * 8. Why or why not? Question Title * 9. How likely is it that you would recommend CMAHC membership to colleagues in the aquatics, public health, academia or environmental health industries? Definitely would Probably would Probably would not Definitely would not Question Title * 10. Please share your overall thoughts about Vote on the Code 2020 – What went well? What needs improvement? What else would you like CMAHC to know? Done