ARCE 2021 Virtual Annual Meeting Survey

Please provide your feedback on this survey. Your input is critical to us as we evaluate the many conference elements and adjust as needed for future years.
1.I attended the Virtual Annual Meeting as a (check all that apply):(Required.)
2.How would you rate the online registration process? (1 being Poor, 5 being Excellent)(Required.)
3.Where do you get news about ARCE and the Annual Meeting? Check all that apply: (Required.)
4.What were your impressions of the papers and virtual presentation platform ( 1 being Poor, 5 being Excellent)?(Required.)
1
2
3
4
5
Variety of topics covered:
Quality of content delivered:
Presentation of material: 
Adherence to schedule: 
Quality of virtual meeting web platform: 
5.What's your overall experience with ARCE's second Virtual Annual Meeting (1 being Poor, 5 being Excellent)? (Required.)
6.What additional information, if any, would you like to see about the Annual Meeting on our website? 
7.Alongside future in-person Annual Meetings, would you like to see ARCE offer some type of virtual participation again, as an add-on? (Required.)
8.If you are an ARCE member, please indicate what level membership you hold: 
9.A benefit of being an ARCE member is receiving biannual issues of Scribe Magazine. Are there areas of focus you would like to see covered in future issues of Scribe?
10.Did you access the virtual copy of Scribe that came as part of your Annual Meeting registration packet?(Required.)
11.What is one thing you find that ARCE delivers that other similar organizations do not?
12.What is one thing that you’d like to see ARCE improve upon?
13.If you are an ARCE Chapter Leader and would like to suggest your Chapter’s location as a possible venue for a future Annual Meeting, please indicate your Chapter name here:
14.Do you plan to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting to be held in Irvine, CA at the Irvine Marriott on April 22-24, 2022?(Required.)
If you were a presenter at the ARCE Annual Meeting 2021, please answer the following three questions:
15.As a presenter, how would you rate the platform (Open Water) that ARCE chose for this Virtual Annual Meeting (1 being Poor, 5 being Excellent)?
16.As a presenter, how do you rate the organization/coordination of ARCE's Virtual Annual Meeting (1 being Poor, 5 being Excellent)?
17.As a presenter, what's your overall experience with ARCE's second Virtual Annual Meeting (1 being Poor, 5 being Excellent)?
18.Any other comments?
Thank you so much for taking the time and energy to share your feedback and ideas with us – we appreciate your participation in helping improve your ARCE Annual Meeting.