Question Title

* 1. Please select the option that best describes your profession:

Question Title

* 2. How many years have you been in practice?

Question Title

* 3. How many patients with CTD do you manage each week?

Question Title

* 4. After participating in this activity, how confident are you in your ability to apply appropriate screening and diagnostic criteria to identify patients with CTDs who have PAH?

Question Title

* 5. Which of the following best describes the impact of this activity on your performance?

Question Title

* 6. How committed are you to making changes in your practice based on your participation in this activity?

Question Title

* 7. What barriers do you see to making changes in your practice?

Question Title

* 8. Please rate your level of agreement by checking the appropriate rating.
5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree

After participating in today’s activity, I am now better able to:

  Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Review the epidemiology and pathophysiology of CTD, and how it places patients at high risk for secondary PAH
Discuss how to use appropriate screening and diagnostic criteria to identify patients with CTDs who may have PAH
Describe how to determine if patients should be referred for cardiac catheterization and definitively diagnose PAH
Outline how to integrate guideline recommendations and efficacy and safety data of PAH pharmacotherapies for treatment of patients with CTD-PAH
Describe how to apply a collaborative approach across multidisciplinary experts to optimize outcomes for patients with CTD-PAH

Question Title

* 9. Please rate your level of agreement by checking the appropriate rating.
5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree

Flavia Castelino, MD

  Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Effectively presented the material
Was knowledgeable
Avoided commercial bias or influence

Question Title

* 10. Please rate your level of agreement by checking the appropriate rating.
5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree

Nicholas S. Hill, MD

  Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Effectively presented the material
Was knowledgeable
Avoided commercial bias or influence

Question Title

* 11. Please rate your level of agreement by checking the appropriate rating.
5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree

For this activity:

  Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
The teaching and learning methods were effective
The learning assessment used was appropriate

Question Title

* 12. Please rate your level of agreement by checking the appropriate rating.
5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree

The content presented:

  Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Enhanced my current knowledge base
Addressed my most pressing questions
Promoted improvements or quality in health care
Was evidence-based and clinically relevant to current practice

Question Title

* 13. As a result of your participation in this activity, what is the one change you are most likely to implement in your practice?

Question Title

* 14. Please list any clinical issues/problems within your scope of practice you would like to see addressed in future educational activities for this or related disease state:

Question Title

* 15. If you indicated that you perceived commercial bias or influence, please describe:

Question Title

* 16. Contact Information

Question Title

* 17. Pharmacists only

Question Title

* 18. Pharmacists only

T