DAF sponsors should be required to have an "inactive funds policy" but without requirements on what that policy should be.
DAF sponsors should be required to have an "inactive funds policy" but without requirements on what that policy should be. Strongly disagree
DAF sponsors should be required to have an "inactive funds policy" but without requirements on what that policy should be. Somewhat disagree
DAF sponsors should be required to have an "inactive funds policy" but without requirements on what that policy should be. Neutral/no opinion
DAF sponsors should be required to have an "inactive funds policy" but without requirements on what that policy should be. Somewhat agree
DAF sponsors should be required to have an "inactive funds policy" but without requirements on what that policy should be. Strongly agree
Requiring DAF sponsors to have an "inactive funds policy" where, if a DAF fund holder has not made any payouts/grants within a certain number of years, the DAF sponsor can distribute from that account or have the account convert to part of the sponsor's endowment.
Requiring DAF sponsors to have an "inactive funds policy" where, if a DAF fund holder has not made any payouts/grants within a certain number of years, the DAF sponsor can distribute from that account or have the account convert to part of the sponsor's endowment. Strongly disagree
Requiring DAF sponsors to have an "inactive funds policy" where, if a DAF fund holder has not made any payouts/grants within a certain number of years, the DAF sponsor can distribute from that account or have the account convert to part of the sponsor's endowment. Somewhat disagree
Requiring DAF sponsors to have an "inactive funds policy" where, if a DAF fund holder has not made any payouts/grants within a certain number of years, the DAF sponsor can distribute from that account or have the account convert to part of the sponsor's endowment. Neutral/no opinion
Requiring DAF sponsors to have an "inactive funds policy" where, if a DAF fund holder has not made any payouts/grants within a certain number of years, the DAF sponsor can distribute from that account or have the account convert to part of the sponsor's endowment. Somewhat agree
Requiring DAF sponsors to have an "inactive funds policy" where, if a DAF fund holder has not made any payouts/grants within a certain number of years, the DAF sponsor can distribute from that account or have the account convert to part of the sponsor's endowment. Strongly agree
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should continue to "count" towards the 5% payout requirements of private foundations.
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should continue to "count" towards the 5% payout requirements of private foundations. Strongly disagree
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should continue to "count" towards the 5% payout requirements of private foundations. Somewhat disagree
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should continue to "count" towards the 5% payout requirements of private foundations. Neutral/no opinion
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should continue to "count" towards the 5% payout requirements of private foundations. Somewhat agree
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should continue to "count" towards the 5% payout requirements of private foundations. Strongly agree
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should NOT be allowed to "count" towards payout requirements.
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should NOT be allowed to "count" towards payout requirements. Strongly disagree
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should NOT be allowed to "count" towards payout requirements. Somewhat disagree
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should NOT be allowed to "count" towards payout requirements. Neutral/no opinion
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should NOT be allowed to "count" towards payout requirements. Somewhat agree
Transferring funds from private foundations to donor-advised funds should NOT be allowed to "count" towards payout requirements. Strongly agree
DAF sponsors should be permitted to make payouts/grants in cryptocurrency.
DAF sponsors should be permitted to make payouts/grants in cryptocurrency. Strongly disagree
DAF sponsors should be permitted to make payouts/grants in cryptocurrency. Somewhat disagree
DAF sponsors should be permitted to make payouts/grants in cryptocurrency. Neutral/no opinion
DAF sponsors should be permitted to make payouts/grants in cryptocurrency. Somewhat agree
DAF sponsors should be permitted to make payouts/grants in cryptocurrency. Strongly agree
DAF sponsors should be required to tell the nonprofit recipient the name of the DAF account holder from which a payout/grant came.
DAF sponsors should be required to tell the nonprofit recipient the name of the DAF account holder from which a payout/grant came. Strongly disagree
DAF sponsors should be required to tell the nonprofit recipient the name of the DAF account holder from which a payout/grant came. Somewhat disagree
DAF sponsors should be required to tell the nonprofit recipient the name of the DAF account holder from which a payout/grant came. Neutral/no opinion
DAF sponsors should be required to tell the nonprofit recipient the name of the DAF account holder from which a payout/grant came. Somewhat agree
DAF sponsors should be required to tell the nonprofit recipient the name of the DAF account holder from which a payout/grant came. Strongly agree
There should be some way for a nonprofit to know something about the donor in case the nonprofit does not want to receive money from that person.
There should be some way for a nonprofit to know something about the donor in case the nonprofit does not want to receive money from that person. Strongly disagree
There should be some way for a nonprofit to know something about the donor in case the nonprofit does not want to receive money from that person. Somewhat disagree
There should be some way for a nonprofit to know something about the donor in case the nonprofit does not want to receive money from that person. Neutral/no opinion
There should be some way for a nonprofit to know something about the donor in case the nonprofit does not want to receive money from that person. Somewhat agree
There should be some way for a nonprofit to know something about the donor in case the nonprofit does not want to receive money from that person. Strongly agree
There should be better oversight of donors who use donor-advised funds to make donations that have significant benefits attached (such as sponsorship of an event, a table at a dinner, season tickets, etc.).
There should be better oversight of donors who use donor-advised funds to make donations that have significant benefits attached (such as sponsorship of an event, a table at a dinner, season tickets, etc.). Strongly disagree
There should be better oversight of donors who use donor-advised funds to make donations that have significant benefits attached (such as sponsorship of an event, a table at a dinner, season tickets, etc.). Somewhat disagree
There should be better oversight of donors who use donor-advised funds to make donations that have significant benefits attached (such as sponsorship of an event, a table at a dinner, season tickets, etc.). Neutral/no opinion
There should be better oversight of donors who use donor-advised funds to make donations that have significant benefits attached (such as sponsorship of an event, a table at a dinner, season tickets, etc.). Somewhat agree
There should be better oversight of donors who use donor-advised funds to make donations that have significant benefits attached (such as sponsorship of an event, a table at a dinner, season tickets, etc.). Strongly agree
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors depending on size (for example, a regulation might apply only to DAF sponsors that have $300 million or more in donor-advised funds).
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors depending on size (for example, a regulation might apply only to DAF sponsors that have $300 million or more in donor-advised funds). Strongly disagree
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors depending on size (for example, a regulation might apply only to DAF sponsors that have $300 million or more in donor-advised funds). Somewhat disagree
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors depending on size (for example, a regulation might apply only to DAF sponsors that have $300 million or more in donor-advised funds). Neutral/no opinion
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors depending on size (for example, a regulation might apply only to DAF sponsors that have $300 million or more in donor-advised funds). Somewhat agree
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors depending on size (for example, a regulation might apply only to DAF sponsors that have $300 million or more in donor-advised funds). Strongly agree
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors that are affiliated with commercial investment firms than for community foundations.
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors that are affiliated with commercial investment firms than for community foundations. Strongly disagree
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors that are affiliated with commercial investment firms than for community foundations. Somewhat disagree
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors that are affiliated with commercial investment firms than for community foundations. Neutral/no opinion
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors that are affiliated with commercial investment firms than for community foundations. Somewhat agree
There should be different rules for DAF sponsors that are affiliated with commercial investment firms than for community foundations. Strongly agree
DAF sponsors should be required to report each year for each fund: how much came into the fund, how much went out, where outgoing funds went, and how much was paid in management fees.
DAF sponsors should be required to report each year for each fund: how much came into the fund, how much went out, where outgoing funds went, and how much was paid in management fees. Strongly disagree
DAF sponsors should be required to report each year for each fund: how much came into the fund, how much went out, where outgoing funds went, and how much was paid in management fees. Somewhat disagree
DAF sponsors should be required to report each year for each fund: how much came into the fund, how much went out, where outgoing funds went, and how much was paid in management fees. Neutral/no opinion
DAF sponsors should be required to report each year for each fund: how much came into the fund, how much went out, where outgoing funds went, and how much was paid in management fees. Somewhat agree
DAF sponsors should be required to report each year for each fund: how much came into the fund, how much went out, where outgoing funds went, and how much was paid in management fees. Strongly agree
DAF sponsors should NOT be required to report any information about individual funds.
DAF sponsors should NOT be required to report any information about individual funds. Strongly disagree
DAF sponsors should NOT be required to report any information about individual funds. Somewhat disagree
DAF sponsors should NOT be required to report any information about individual funds. Neutral/no opinion
DAF sponsors should NOT be required to report any information about individual funds. Somewhat agree
DAF sponsors should NOT be required to report any information about individual funds. Strongly agree